Enhancing physical protection of critical infrastructures

Expected Outcome: Project results are expected to contribute to some or all of the following outcomes: Critical infrastructure operators and authorities have improved physical risks and hazards assessment capabilities; Perimeter security, access control, surveillance systems, remote sensors and other systems used by or relevant to critical infrastructure operators are capable of coping with threats from misuse of new and emerging technologies; Improved operational procedures, including incidents management and training curricula, are developed; Innovative solutions for critical infrastructure resilience are being developed, utilising recent advancements in spatial planning, security-by-design, preparedness-by-design and nature-based solutions using an inclusive approach that address diverse needs. Scope: Physical protection of critical infrastructure should keep up its advancement to mat… more

Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP)Long term health hazard prevention in security related situationsOperators of critical infrastructureSecurityTrainingCritical infrastructure operatorsInnovative solutionsemerging technologieshazards assessment capabilitiesnature-based solutionsphysical protection of critical infrastructurespreparedness-by-designsecurity-by-designspatial planningsurveillance systemstraining curricula

1. %40
   FAHRİ BİRİNCİ

   Doktor Öğretim ÜyesiOndokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi

   Research topics: Urban Transport and Accessibility · Landslides and related hazards · Transportation Planning and Optimization

2. %40
   GÖKHAN KARAKÖSE

   Doktor Öğretim ÜyesiBartın Üniversitesi

   Research topics: Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis · Transportation Planning and Optimization · Complex Network Analysis Techniques

3. %40
   ZÜHAL ÖZCAN YAVUZ

   Doktor Öğretim ÜyesiBahçeşehir Üniversitesi

   Research topics: Fire effects on ecosystems · Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Landslides and related hazards

The fit is computed by code on every request: semantic similarity (55%) between the call text (title, EU keywords, start of the official description) and the academic’s YÖKSİS fields, keywords and OpenAlex topics, plus shared distinctive terms (45%; common words weigh little). Below 40% is not shown. A subject hint only — not an eligibility, capacity or merit assessment. Hidden profiles are never listed.