Skip to content
akaturk Academic measurement

Article detail · 2020 · article

VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE LONDON CHEST ACTIVITY OF DAILY LIVING SCALE IN OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASES

ISSN2149-2530
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Open access · diamond TR Index
Year2020
Citations24OpenAlex
Citations25Semantic Scholar · 2 influential
Percentile%77.9
FWCI1.071.00 = world average
Scopus (SJR)Q3

Data source split

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS article record
  • YÖKSİS venueTurkish Thoracic Journal
  • Catalog match (ISSN)Turkish Thoracic Journal
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)
  • Semantic Scholarcitation count (not merged with OpenAlex)

Abstract

OpenAlex English

OBJECTIVES:The London Chest Activity of Daily Living Scale (LCADL) is a simple, useful, and comprehensive measure of dyspnea perception in activities of daily living.This study was conducted to determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the LCADL. MATERIALS AND METHODS:A total of 64 patients with obstructive lung disease (24 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 20 asthma, and 20 bronchiectasis patients) were included.The Turkish LCADL was evaluated for interobserver reliability, test-retest reliability, and criterion validity.Two different observers applied the scale with an interval of 10 minutes to assess interobserver reliability.The second observer applied the scale twice at an interval of 10-15 days to assess test-retest reliability.Criterion validity was assessed using the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), and Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). RESULTS:The interobserver reliability of the scale was very high (r s =0.985, p<0.050).Cronbach's alpha coefficient for total score was 0.976 and intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.953.These results indicate that the Turkish LCADL has high reliability.The correlation between LCADL and 6MWT was moderate 0.503 (p=0.002).The LCADL total score was weakly correlated with NHP total score (r s =0.370, p=0.040) and SGRQ total score (r s =0.367, p=0.004). CONCLUSION:The Turkish version of the LCADL scale is reliable and valid in obstructive lung disease.The LCADL scale will be beneficial in existing pulmonary rehabilitation programs aiming to improve functional status.We believe that using the Turkish LCADL scale as an outcome measure in pulmonary rehabilitation programs will serve as an indicator of rehabilitation efficacy for individual patients.

Topics

Citations

OpenAlex cited_by_count. Not a WoS or Scopus citation count; those sources have no separate column here.

24citationsOpenAlex · cited_by_count (cache / database)

57 publications in the local catalog that cite this work (OpenAlex reference match; not the full global list).

  1. 2021 Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Post-COVID-19 Functional Status ScaleCitations 41 · OpenAlex
  2. 2021 Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Post-COVID-19 Functional Status ScaleCitations 41 · OpenAlex
  3. 2021 Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Post-COVID-19 Functional Status ScaleCitations 41 · OpenAlex
  4. 2021 Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Post-COVID-19 Functional Status ScaleCitations 41 · OpenAlex
  5. 2021 Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Post-COVID-19 Functional Status ScaleCitations 41 · OpenAlex
  6. 2021 Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Post-COVID-19 Functional Status ScaleCitations 41 · OpenAlex
  7. 2022 Validity and reliability of 6-minute pegboard and ring test in patients with asthmaCitations 26 · OpenAlex
  8. 2022 Validity and reliability of 6-minute pegboard and ring test in patients with asthmaCitations 26 · OpenAlex
  9. 2022 Validity and reliability of 6-minute pegboard and ring test in patients with asthmaCitations 26 · OpenAlex
  10. 2022 Validity and reliability of 6-minute pegboard and ring test in patients with asthmaCitations 26 · OpenAlex

Authors

10
  1. SEDA SAKA HALİÇ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 1
  2. SEMA SAVCI ACIBADEM MEHMET ALİ AYDINLAR ÜNİVERSİTESİ 2
  3. EBRU ÇALIK HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ 3
  4. MELDA SAĞLAM HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ 4
  5. NACİYE VARDAR YAĞLI HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ 5
  6. DENİZ İNAL İNCE HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ 6
  7. MERAL BOŞNAK GÜÇLÜ 7
  8. HÜLYA ARIKAN 8
  9. GÜL KARAKAYA HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ 9
  10. LÜTFİ ÇÖPLÜ 10