Article detail · 2012
A Comparison of paper and pencil and computerized forms of line orientation and enhanced cued recall tests
Journal
Psychological Reports- Year
- 2012
- Type
- article
Data source split
- YÖKSİS YÖKSİS article record
- YÖKSİS venue Psychological Reports
- OpenAlex OpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)
Abstract
OpenAlex · English
The purpose of this study was to assess whether a computerized battery of neuropsychological tests could produce similar results as the conventional forms. Comparisons on 77 volunteer undergraduates were carried out with two neuropsychological tests: Line Orientation Test and Enhanced Cued Recall Test. Firstly, students were assigned randomly across the test medium (paper-and-pencil versus computerized). Secondly, the groups were given the same test in the other medium after a 30-day interval between tests. Results showed that the Enhanced Cued Recall Test-Computer-based did not correlate with the Enhanced Cued Recall Test-Paper-and-pencil results. Line Orientation Test-Computer-based scores, on the other hand, did correlate significantly with the Line Orientation Test-Paper-and-pencil version. In both tests, scores were higher on paper-and-pencil tests compared to computer-based tests. Total score difference between modalities was statistically significant for both Enhanced Cued Recall Tests and for the Line Orientation Test. In both computer-based tests, it took less time for participants to complete the tests.
Topics
Citations
OpenAlex cited_by_count. Not a WoS or Scopus citation count; those sources have no separate column here.
16 citations
OpenAlex cited_by_count (cache / database)
2 publications in the local catalog that cite this work (OpenAlex reference match; not the full global list).