Skip to content
akaturk Academic measurement

Article detail · 2003 · article

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Localized Prostate Cancer: Efficacy Results from the European Multicentric Study

Journal Journal of Endourology
OpenAlex Top 10%
Year2003
Citations300OpenAlex
Citations296Semantic Scholar · 12 influential
Percentile%99.0
FWCI11.711.00 = world average
Scopus (SJR)Q1
WoS (JCR)Q3

Data source split

  • YÖKSİS venueJournal of Endourology
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)
  • Semantic Scholarcitation count (not merged with OpenAlex)

Abstract

OpenAlex English

PURPOSE: To describe the safety and efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for the treatment of prostate cancer as assessed in a Phase II/III prospective multicentric clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (N = 402) presenting with localized (stage T(1-2)N(0-x)M(0)) prostate cancer between 1995 and 1999 at six European sites who were not candidates for radical prostatectomy were treated with HIFU under general or spinal anesthesia. Their mean age was 69.3 +/- 7.1 (SD) years, the mean prostate volume 28.0 +/- 13.8 cc, and the mean serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentration 10.9 +/- 8.7 ng/mL. Nearly all (92.2%) of the patients had one to four positive biopsy samples at baseline. The Gleason scores were 2 to 4 for 13.2% of the patients, 5 to 7 for 77.5%, and 8 to 10 for 9.3%. During the follow-up, random sextant biopsies and serum PSA measurements were performed. Any positive sample in biopsies performed after the last treatment session resulted in a "HIFU failure" classification. RESULTS: The patients received a mean of 1.4 HIFU sessions. The mean follow-up duration was 407 days (quartile 1 135 days, median 321 days, quartile 3 598 days). The negative biopsy rate observed in the T1-2 primary-care population was 87.2%. These results were also stratified according to the usual disease-related risk classification, and as much as a 92.1% negative biopsy rate was observed in low-risk patients. Nadir PSA results correlated with prostate size and the clinical procedure. CONCLUSION: These short-term results obtained on a large cohort confirm that HIFU is an option to be considered for the primary treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Topics

Citations

OpenAlex cited_by_count. Not a WoS or Scopus citation count; those sources have no separate column here.

300citationsOpenAlex · cited_by_count (cache / database)

7 publications in the local catalog that cite this work (OpenAlex reference match; not the full global list).

  1. 2012 High‐intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for definitive treatment of prostate cancerCitations 129 · OpenAlex
  2. 2008 Transrectal High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Devices: A Critical Appraisal of the Available EvidenceCitations 37 · OpenAlex
  3. 2011 Bubbly Cavitating Flow Generation and Investigation of Its Erosional Nature for Biomedical ApplicationsCitations 28 · OpenAlex
  4. 2011 Bubbly Cavitating Flow Generation and Investigation of Its Erosional Nature for Biomedical ApplicationsCitations 28 · OpenAlex
  5. 2007 HIFU and cryoablation – non or minimal touch techniques for the treatment of prostate cancer. Is there a role for contrast enhanced ultrasound?Citations 22 · OpenAlex
  6. 2015 Re: Predicting High-Grade Cancer at Ten-Core Prostate Biopsy Using Four Kallikrein Markers Measured in Blood in the ProtecT StudyCitations 0 · OpenAlex
  7. 2015 Focal Treatment Alternatives in Prostate CancerCitations 0 · OpenAlex

Authors

No author information.