Skip to content
akaturk Academic measurement

Article detail · 2025 · review

Effects of Shift Work on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Nurses: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

ISSN1545-102X
YÖKSİS OpenAlex
Year2025
Citations4OpenAlex
Citations5Semantic Scholar · 1 influential
Percentile%71.6
FWCI0.961.00 = world average
Scopus (SJR)Q1
WoS (JCR)Q1

Data source split

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS article record
  • YÖKSİS venueWorldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
  • Catalog match (ISSN)Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)
  • Semantic Scholarcitation count (not merged with OpenAlex)

Abstract

OpenAlex English

ABSTRACT Background Shift work—especially during night hours—adversely affects nurses’ cognitive and motor performance, potentially compromising patient safety. Variations in shift duration and rotation patterns contribute to these effects. Implementing evidence‐based strategies such as optimized scheduling, structured rest breaks, and supportive work environments may mitigate performance declines. These findings highlight the importance of organizational policies aimed at protecting both healthcare workers and patient outcomes. Methods A comprehensive search across PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science identified 22 studies with 224 comparison data points for inclusion. Study quality was assessed using the ROBINS‐I tool across seven bias domains. Analyses were performed using Python, applying random‐effects models to account for heterogeneity (Cochran's Q , I 2 ), with Egger's test used for publication bias assessment. Results Day shifts led to a small performance decline (Hedges' g = 0.238, 95% CI [0.155, 0.321]), while night shifts caused a more substantial decline (Hedges' g = 0.386, 95% CI: 0.320 to 0.451). Motor performance across all shift types showed a moderate effect size (Hedges' g = 0.326, 95% CI [0.210, 0.442]). Comparing day shifts to nonstandard shifts, a small effect size (Hedges' g = 0.220, 95% CI [0.171, 0.269]) highlighted reduced performance under irregular shift conditions. High heterogeneity in night shifts ( I 2 = 86.8%) suggested variability in study designs and methodologies. Linking Evidence to Action Shift work, particularly night shifts, negatively impacts cognitive and motor performance, posing risks to clinical safety. The variability in shift durations (6–17 h) and different shift rotation strategies contributed to heterogeneity. Targeted interventions, including optimized scheduling, adequate rest breaks, and supportive workplace practices, are needed to mitigate negative effects. This meta‐analysis provides evidence‐based insights into the detrimental effects of shift work on nurses' performance, supporting the development of policies and strategies to promote safer clinical environments and enhance healthcare quality. Trial Registration: PROSPERO

Topics

Citations

OpenAlex cited_by_count. Not a WoS or Scopus citation count; those sources have no separate column here.

4citationsOpenAlex · cited_by_count (cache / database)

Authors

2
  1. FADİME ULUPINAR ERZURUM TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ 1
  2. SÜLEYMAN ULUPINAR 2