Article detail · 2024
Generative Artificial Intelligence Acceptance Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study
Journal
Informa UK LimitedISSN 1044-7318
The ISSN points to another catalog journal; the name is from the YÖKSİS record.
- Year
- 2024
- Type
- article
Data source split
- YÖKSİS YÖKSİS article record
- YÖKSİS venue Informa UK Limited
- Catalog match (ISSN) International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
- OpenAlex OpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)
Abstract
OpenAlex · English
The purpose of this study is to formulate an acceptance scale grounded in the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. The scale is designed to scrutinize students’ acceptance of generative artificial intelligence (AI) applications. This tool assesses students’ acceptance levels toward generative AI applications. The scale development study was conducted in three phases, encompassing 627 university students from various faculties who have utilized generative AI tools such as ChatGPT during the 2022–2023 academic year. To evaluate the face and content validity of the scale, input was sought from professionals with expertise in the field. The initial sample group (n = 338) underwent exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to explore the underlying factors, while the subsequent sample group (n = 250) underwent confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for the verification of factor structure. Later, it was seen that four factors comprising 20 items accounted for 78.349% of total variance due to EFA. CFA results confirmed that structure of the scale, featuring 20 items and four factors (performance expectancy, effort expectancy, facilitating conditions, and social influence), was compatible with the obtained data. Reliability analysis yielded Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.97, and the test–retest method demonstrated a reliability coefficient of 0.95. To evaluate the discriminative power of the items, a comparative analysis was conducted between the lower 27% and upper 27% of participants, with subsequent calculation of corrected item-total correlations. The results demonstrate that the generative AI acceptance scale exhibits robust validity and reliability, thus affirming its effectiveness as a robust measurement instrument.
Topics
Citations
OpenAlex cited_by_count. Not a WoS or Scopus citation count; those sources have no separate column here.
225 citations
OpenAlex cited_by_count (cache / database)
79 publications in the local catalog that cite this work (OpenAlex reference match; not the full global list).
- Generative artificial intelligence acceptance and artificial intelligence anxiety among university students: the sequential mediating role of attitudes toward artificial intelligence and literacy 2025
- Generative artificial intelligence acceptance and artificial intelligence anxiety among university students: the sequential mediating role of attitudes toward artificial intelligence and literacy 2025
- Exploring the role of self-regulated learnings skills, cognitive flexibility, and metacognitive awareness on generative artificial intelligence attitude 2025
- Exploring the role of self-regulated learnings skills, cognitive flexibility, and metacognitive awareness on generative artificial intelligence attitude 2025
- AI readiness scale for teachers: Development and validation 2025
- Generative Artificial Intelligence as a Lifelong Learning Self Efficacy: Usage and Competence Scale 2024
- Generative artificial intelligence acceptance, anxiety, and behavioral intention in the middle east: a TAM-based structural equation modelling approach 2025
- What makes university students accept generative artificial intelligence? A moderated mediation model 2025
- Uncertainty and well-being in Turkish adults: Exploring the role of religiosity and psychological symptoms 2025
- Development of Teachers’ Perception Scale Regarding Artificial Intelligence Use in Education: Validity and Reliability Study 2025