Skip to content
akaturk Academic measurement

Article detail · 2022 · article

Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Challenge-Hindrance Demands Scale for the Nursing Profession

Journal International Journal Of Clinical Practice
ISSN3912003
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Open access · gold Top 10%
Year2022
Citations4OpenAlex
Percentile%99.0
FWCI20.311.00 = world average
Scopus (SJR)Q2
WoS (JCR)Q3

Data source split

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS article record
  • YÖKSİS venueInternational Journal Of Clinical Practice
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)
  • Semantic Scholarcitation count (not merged with OpenAlex)

Abstract

OpenAlex English

This study aims to adapt “the Challenge‐Hindrance Demands Scale for Nursing Professional” developed by Mahaverachartkul and Sooraksa; regarding “how nurses who are under heavy workload and stress as well as intense and tiring working hours perceive many stressful situations in the working environment as challenges or hindrances” to Turkish language and bring it to the use of national literature. In terms of method, the research was designed within the scope of the quantitative research model. Data collected from 450 nurses were used in this study. The research data were analyzed in SPSS 26.0 and AMOS 24.0 statistical programs. The validity of the scales used in this study was evaluated with exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). According to the EFA findings of the Challenge Demands Scale, when the KMO value (0.919) and the Bartlett sphericity test value (X2 (78) = 4121.203; p = 0.001) were examined, it was seen that the data were suitable for analysis. When the CFA findings of the Challenge Demands Scale were examined, it was seen that the fit indices were at an acceptable level (X2 (60) = 223.912; p = 0.001; CMIN/df = 3.732; CFI = 0.960; TLI = 0.948; RMSEA = 0.078; SRMR = 0.039). According to the EFA findings of the Hindrance Demands Scale, when the KMO value (0.947) and the Bartlett sphericity test value (X2 (78) = 5263.056; p = 0.001) were examined, it was seen that the data were suitable for analysis. When the CFA findings of the Hindrance Demands Scale were examined, it was seen that the fit indices were at an acceptable level (X2 (61) = 208.794; p = 0.001; CMIN/df = 3.423; CFI = 0.972; TLI = 0.964; RMSEA = 0.073; SRMR = 0.032). In conclusion, the Challenge‐Hindrance Demands Scale for Nursing Professionals with 13 items and four dimensions developed to measure the stress, hindrance, and challenge levels of nurses in their professional life in Turkey may be used in future studies.

Topics

Citations

OpenAlex cited_by_count. Not a WoS or Scopus citation count; those sources have no separate column here.

4citationsOpenAlex · cited_by_count (cache / database)

Authors

4
  1. HANDAN ERTAŞ SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ 1
  2. EMEL FİLİZ SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ 2
  3. ŞEYMA KAHVECİ 3
  4. Seda Nur Ünal 4