Skip to content
akaturk Academic measurement

Article detail · 2016 · article

Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prognostic Scoring Systems

ISSN1300-7777
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Open access · diamond TR Index
Year2016
Citations9OpenAlex
Citations8Semantic Scholar · 2 influential
Percentile%66.3
FWCI0.431.00 = world average
Scopus (SJR)Q4
WoS (JCR)Q4

Data source split

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS article record
  • YÖKSİS venueTurkish Journal of Hematology
  • Catalog match (ISSN)Turkish Journal of Hematology
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)
  • Semantic Scholarcitation count (not merged with OpenAlex)

Abstract

OpenAlex English

OBJECTIVE: Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disease. Patients are at risk of developing cytopenias or progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Different classifications and prognostic scoring systems have been developed. The aim of this study was to compare the different prognostic scoring systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and one patients who were diagnosed with primary MDS in 2003-2011 in a tertiary care university hospital's hematology department were included in the study. RESULTS: As the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), World Health Organization Classification-Based Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS), MD Anderson Prognostic Scoring System (MPSS), and revised IPSS (IPSS-R) risk categories increased, leukemia-free survival and overall survival decreased (p<0.001). When the IPSS, WPSS, MPSS, and IPSS-R prognostic systems were compared by Cox regression analysis, the WPSS was the best in predicting leukemia-free survival (p<0.001), and the WPSS (p<0.001) and IPSS-R (p=0.037) were better in predicting overall survival. CONCLUSION: All 4 prognostic systems were successful in predicting overall survival and leukemia-free survival (p<0.001). The WPSS was found to be the best predictor for leukemia-free survival, while the WPSS and IPSS-R were found to be the best predictors for overall survival.

Topics

Citations

OpenAlex cited_by_count. Not a WoS or Scopus citation count; those sources have no separate column here.

9citationsOpenAlex · cited_by_count (cache / database)

10 publications in the local catalog that cite this work (OpenAlex reference match; not the full global list).

  1. 2016 Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prognostic Scoring SystemsCitations 9 · OpenAlex
  2. 2016 Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prognostic Scoring SystemsCitations 9 · OpenAlex
  3. 2016 Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prognostic Scoring SystemsCitations 9 · OpenAlex
  4. 2016 Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prognostic Scoring SystemsCitations 9 · OpenAlex
  5. 2016 Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prognostic Scoring SystemsCitations 9 · OpenAlex
  6. 2016 Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prognostic Scoring SystemsCitations 9 · OpenAlex
  7. 2016 Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prognostic Scoring SystemsCitations 9 · OpenAlex
  8. 2015 Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prognostic Scoring SystemsCitations 9 · OpenAlex
  9. 2015 Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome prognostic scoring systemCitations 9 · OpenAlex

Authors

19
  1. Bektaş Özlen 1
  2. AYŞEGÜL ÜNER 2
  3. Eylem Eliaçık 3
  4. BURAK UZ 4
  5. Ayşe Işık 5
  6. SEZGİN ETGÜL 6
  7. SÜREYYA BOZKURT 7
  8. İBRAHİM CELALETTİN HAZNEDAROĞLU 8
  9. HAKAN GÖKER 9
  10. NİLGÜN SAYINALP 10
  11. SALİH AKSU HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ 11
  12. HALUK DEMİROĞLU 12
  13. OSMAN İLHAMİ ÖZCEBE 13
  14. YAHYA BÜYÜKAŞIK 14
  15. BETÜL MUTLU 15
  16. ELİF AYDIN 16
  17. SAADET MALTEPE 17
  18. EYLEM EZGİ AHISKALI 18
  19. MUTLU SOYKURT 19