Skip to content
akaturk Academic measurement

Article detail · 2025 · article

Impact of scan body splinting on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant impressions

ISSN1991-7902
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Open access · gold Top 10%
Year2025
Citations5OpenAlex
Citations7Semantic Scholar · 1 influential
Percentile%94.3
FWCI4.421.00 = world average
Scopus (SJR)Q1
WoS (JCR)Q1

Data source split

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS article record
  • YÖKSİS venueJournal of Dental Sciences
  • Catalog match (ISSN)Journal of Dental Sciences
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)
  • Semantic Scholarcitation count (not merged with OpenAlex)

Abstract

OpenAlex English

Background/purpose The accuracy of intraoral scanners in capturing complete-arch implant impressions remains a subject of ongoing investigation. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of different scanning strategies and the effect of splinting scan bodies on the accuracy of complete digital scans of the mandible. Materials and methods A master model of an edentulous mandible with four dental implants was used. The implants were positioned bilaterally in the regions of the mandibular lateral incisors and second premolars. A laboratory scanner was utilized to digitize the reference model. Three experimental groups were used to evaluate the effects of different scanning strategies and auxiliary reference methods on scan accuracy: Group A (single-stage scan), Group B (two-stage scan without additional references), and Group C (two-stage scan with additional reference points). Results A total of 45 digital scans were analyzed. To evaluate scan accuracy, linear deviations were measured at the four implant sites and compared against the digital reference model. Group A consistently demonstrated the highest accuracy, with the lowest overall mean linear deviation of 39.57 ± 8.69 μm across all implant positions. Group B recorded a marginally higher mean deviation of 42.80 ± 24.24 μm. Group C showed the greatest linear deviation (70.60 ± 17.69 μm), and the differences were statistically significant when compared with both Groups A and B ( P < 0.05). Conclusion The findings of this study indicate that single-stage scanning yields superior accuracy, whereas the incorporation of poorly designed or improperly positioned reference markers may inadvertently compromise scan precision.

Topics

Citations

OpenAlex cited_by_count. Not a WoS or Scopus citation count; those sources have no separate column here.

5citationsOpenAlex · cited_by_count (cache / database)

4 publications in the local catalog that cite this work (OpenAlex reference match; not the full global list).

  1. 2026 Digital Implant Position Recording in Complete-Arch Prostheses: Intraoral and Extraoral TechniquesCitations 0 · OpenAlex
  2. 2026 Digital Implant Position Recording in Complete-Arch Prostheses: Intraoral and Extraoral TechniquesCitations 0 · OpenAlex
  3. 2025 Trueness of Complete-Arch Implant Scans: Influence of Scanning Technique, Intraoral Scanner, and Implant Position (Part I: Linear and Angular Deviations)Citations 0 · OpenAlex
  4. 2025 Trueness of Complete-Arch Implant Scans: Influence of Scanning Technique, Intraoral Scanner, and Implant Position (Part I: Linear and Angular Deviations)Citations 0 · OpenAlex

Authors

5
  1. HALE ARIKAN KALAYCI 1
  2. SEMA MERVE SÜMER 2
  3. İLSER TÜRKYILMAZ 3
  4. Mackenzie Hunt 4
  5. MUSTAFA BARIŞ GÜNCÜ HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ 5