Crime prevention approaches, online and off-line, tackling the nexus between addictions and crime

Expected Outcome: Project results are expected to contribute to some or all of the following expected outcomes: Improved understanding of links between addictions and crime, including drivers of criminality; Innovative and effective solutions, including training curricula, for Police Authorities in Europe and relevant Civil Society Organisations (or Non-Governmental Organisations) to prevent addictions and related crimes, with a special attention to young people at risk; Evidence-based support to modernising European criminal justice system’s approach when dealing with addiction-related offenses; Novel approaches of collaboration between different stakeholders, primarily Police Authorities in Europe and Civil Society Organisations (or Non-Governmental Organisations), to increase communities’ addiction resilience, security and safety. Scope: A close and complex relationship exists between… more

Education and training of police authoritiesFight against crime and terrorismLaw, criminology, penologyPolice authoritiesSecuritySocietal issues in crime and terrorismCivil Society OrganisationsCrimeaddictioncommunitiesjusticeoff-lineonlinepolicesafetytraining

1. %55
   BUMİNHAN DUMAN

   Doktor Öğretim ÜyesiAfyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi

   Shared topics: Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance

2. %55
   İBRAHİM HAKKI BULUT

   Doktor Öğretim Üyesiİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi

   Shared topics: Crime Patterns and Interventions

3. %52
   DERYA TEKİN

   Doçentİstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi

   Shared topics: Crime Patterns and Interventions

4. %48
   MİNE ÖZAŞÇILAR ÖZTÜRK

   ProfesörBahçeşehir Üniversitesi

   Shared topics: Crime Patterns and Interventions · Crime, Deviance, and Social Control

The fit is computed by code on every request: semantic similarity (55%) between the call text (title, EU keywords, start of the official description) and the academic’s YÖKSİS fields, keywords and OpenAlex topics, plus shared distinctive terms (45%; common words weigh little). Below 40% is not shown. A subject hint only — not an eligibility, capacity or merit assessment. Hidden profiles are never listed.