Ufuk Avrupa · Global Challenges and European Industrial Competitiveness
Carbon farming innovation and scale-up
Çağrı özeti
Resmi metinden, ilk bölüm
Expected Outcome: Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes: models, methods and data needed for the quantification of carbon farming activities and results are available for integration in a single monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) system, so that the costs and burden associated to carbon farming MRV are reduced to a minimum; use of carbon-removal and emission-reduction certification is facilitated at scale, and the EU Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming (CRCF) Regulation [1] becomes the basis for cost-effective certification of carbon farming in different contexts; carbon farming actors involved in CRCF implementation in different roles – including land managers and other market participants as well as certification and governance bodies – have access to relevant scientific knowledge and tailored technical support for the implementat… devamı
AgricultureCarbon capture and sequestrationCertification schemesClimate change mitigationEarth Observation / Services and applicationsForestryCRCF certification and registryCarbon Removals and Carbon Farming (CRCF) Regulationcarbon farmingcarbon farming innovationcertificationgreenhouse gas inventoriesmodels, methods and datamonitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) systemquantificationscale-up
İlgili olabilecek akademisyenler
Konu uyumuna göre
5-
%52ALİ DEVLET
Ortak konular: Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
-
%43CAFER GENÇOĞLAN
Ortak konular: Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
-
%43SAİT ÜSTÜN
Ortak konular: Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
-
%40KADİR SALTALI
Ortak konular: Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
-
%40SAKİNE ÇETİN TANER
Ortak konular: Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Uyum oranı kodla, her istekte hesaplanır: çağrı metni (başlık, AB anahtar kelimeleri, resmi açıklamanın başı) ile akademisyenin YÖKSİS alanları, anahtar kelimeleri ve OpenAlex konuları arasındaki anlamsal yakınlık (%55) ve ortak ayırt edici terimler (%45; yaygın kelimeler düşük ağırlıklı). %40 altı gösterilmez. Bir konu önerisidir; başvuru uygunluğu, kapasite ya da başarı değerlendirmesi değildir. Gizli profiller listelenmez.