Article detail · 2010 · article
Our Early Experiences With Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery
Data source split
- YÖKSİSYÖKSİS article record
- YÖKSİS venueSurgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques
- Catalog match (ISSN)Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques
- OpenAlexOpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most of the laparoscopic surgeons have been attempting to reduce incisional morbidity and improve cosmetic outcomes by using fewer and smaller ports. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a new laparoscopic procedure. Herein we would like to present our experiences. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2009 and October 2009, data of the 32 patients who were operated through SILS are evaluated prospectively. There were 22 females and 10 males with a mean age of 45.1±14.8 years. Ten splenectomies for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, 16 cholecystectomies for acute cholecystitis or asymptomatic gallstones, 3 appendectomies for acute appendicitis, one distal pancreatosplenectomy for Renal Cell Cancer metastases, 1 adrenalectomy for Conn Syndrome and 1 case of liver resection for hepatic adenoma were carried out. The most common splenectomy indication was idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, cholecystectomy indication was acute cholecystitis (n=8), and asymptomatic cholelithiasis (n=8), appendectomy indication was acute appendicitis, distal pancreatosplenectomy indication was renal cell cancer metastases, adrenalectomy indication was Conn syndrome and liver resection indication was left hepatic mass in between segments 1 and 2. SILS was carried out successfully in 31 patients. Only in 1 patient conversion was required owing to bleeding. RESULTS: All procedures were carried out through a 2-cm umbilical incision. There was no mortality and morbidity recorded. CONCLUSIONS: In experienced hands of minimally invasive surgeons, SILS incision laparoscopic surgery could be carried out successfully in a wide range of surgical operations. However, to be able to show the differences between Standard laparoscopic surgery and single SILS, prospective randomized comparative studies are required.
Topics
Citations
OpenAlex cited_by_count. Not a WoS or Scopus citation count; those sources have no separate column here.
36citationsOpenAlex · cited_by_count (cache / database)
18 publications in the local catalog that cite this work (OpenAlex reference match; not the full global list).
- 2012 Single incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Laparoscopic CholecystectomyCitations 56 · OpenAlex
- 2012 Single incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Laparoscopic CholecystectomyCitations 56 · OpenAlex
- 2015 Single incision laparoscopic surgery for hepatic hydatid disease. Report of a case.Citations 11 · OpenAlex
- 2015 Comparison of single port and three port laparoscopic splenectomy in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura Clinical comparative studyCitations 10 · OpenAlex
- 2015 Comparison of single port and three port laparoscopic splenectomy in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura: Clinical comparative studyCitations 10 · OpenAlex
- 2015 Comparison of single port and three port laparoscopic splenectomy in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura Clinical comparative studyCitations 10 · OpenAlex
- 2013 Experiences of Single Incision CholecystectomyCitations 10 · OpenAlex
- 2013 Experiences of Single Incision CholecystectomyCitations 10 · OpenAlex
- 2012 Experiences of Single Incision CholecystectomyCitations 10 · OpenAlex
- 2013 Cholecystectomy Conducted with Single Port Incisionless Intracorporeal Conventional Equipment Endoscopic SurgeryCitations 6 · OpenAlex