Skip to content
akaturk Academic measurement

Article detail · 2012 · article

O estado de necessidade por coação no direito alemão

Journal Sistema Penal & Violência
OpenAlex
Year2012
Citations0OpenAlex
Percentile%15.0
FWCI0.01.00 = world average

Data source split

  • YÖKSİS venueSistema Penal & Violência
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)

Abstract

OpenAlex pt

The German Criminal Code sets out two forms of necessity defence: one is justifying necessity, which is based on the balancing of interests, and the other, excusing necessity, which merely excuses D under strictly defined conditions. Duress by threats, however, is not explicitly regulated by German law, as, with regard to the defence of necessity, the source of threat is irrelevant. It may derive from natural force or, as in the case of duress by threats, from human agency. In German legal doctrine, there is a long-standing discussion on the doctrinal classification of the defence of duress by threats, that is, whether it is solely a sub-form of excusing necessity or under certain circumstances would it be subsumed under justifying necessity. The present article discusses the arguments which have been put forward on this issue in the doctrine, as well as the legal nature of this legal institution.

Topics

Citations

OpenAlex cited_by_count. Not a WoS or Scopus citation count; those sources have no separate column here.

0citationsOpenAlex · cited_by_count (cache / database)

Authors

No author information.