Article detail · 2006
Subcutaneous venous port implantation in adult patients: a single center experience.
Journal
PubMed- Year
- 2006
- Type
- article
Data source split
- YÖKSİS venue PubMed
- OpenAlex OpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)
Abstract
OpenAlex · English
PURPOSE: To present the midterm follow-up results of subcutaneous venous chest ports in adult patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2001 and November 2005, 476 subcutaneous venous chest ports were placed in 472 adult patients. Five patients underwent port implantation twice. All the ports had single lumen catheters. The procedures were performed under intravenous sedation as well as local anesthesia. All ports were placed on the anterior chest wall, except one, which was placed on the trapezius muscle. RESULTS: The technical success rate was 99.8%. The procedure- related minor complication rate was 0.63% (total: 3 cases; 1 hematoma during local anesthesia application, and 2 early hematomas) and there were no major complications. Mean duration of catheter usage was 376 days (total: 178,997 catheter days; range: 2 to 1522 catheter days). Late complications occurred at a rate of 10.7% (51 cases). Among those 51 cases, 36 (7.6%) developed minor complications in which port removal was not needed; however, 15 ports (3.15%) had to be removed due to major complications. Seven ports (1.47%) were explanted due to treatment-resistant bacteremia and sepsis, in addition to 2 other ports (0.42%) because of port pocket infections. An additional 6 ports (1.26%) required explantation for the following reasons: skin necrosis (0.21%); incision dehiscence (0.21%); broken or torn catheter (0.42%); jugular vein thrombosis (0.21%); thrombosis of superior caval vein (0.21%). CONCLUSION: Radiological implantation of subcutaneous venous ports can be performed with similar or lower complication rates as compared to the surgical literature, due to the obvious advantage of imaging guidance. Hence, we think that port implantation with imaging guidance will become the preferred implantation method in the future.
Topics
Citations
OpenAlex cited_by_count. Not a WoS or Scopus citation count; those sources have no separate column here.
82 citations
OpenAlex cited_by_count (cache / database)
20 publications in the local catalog that cite this work (OpenAlex reference match; not the full global list).
- Comparison of subcutaneous central venous port via jugular and subclavian access in 347 patients at a single center 2012
- Retrospective evaluation of totally implantable venous access port devices: early and late complications. 2015
- Radiologically Placed Venous Ports in Children 2007
- Performance of Venous Port Catheter Insertion by a General Surgeon: A Prospective Study 2015
- Trapezius Port Placement in Patients with Breast Cancer: Long-Term Follow-up and Quality-of-Life Assessment 2018
- The effect of chemotherapy type and timing among the other factors on patency of totally implantable vascular access devices in colorectal carcinoma 2021
- Evalution of Central Venous Catheter Ports Placed by Medical Oncologists A Single Center Experience 2016
- Comparison of Implantable Central Venous Ports: Subclavian Versus Juguler Access 2013
- Comparison of Implantable Central Venous Ports Subclavian Versus Juguler Access 2013
- Central Vein Dilatation Prior to Concomitant Port Implantation 2009