Skip to content
akaturk Academic measurement

Article detail · 2026

Original Versus Generic Eltrombopag in Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Prospective Multi-Center Experience on Efficacy and Safety

Journal

Journal of Clinical Medicine

ISSN 2077-0383

YÖKSİS OpenAlex Open access · gold SJR Q2 JCR Q1 Citations 0 Percentile 2.8% FWCI 0.0
Year
2026
Type
article

Data source split

  • YÖKSİS YÖKSİS article record
  • YÖKSİS venue JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
  • Catalog match (ISSN) Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • OpenAlex OpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)

Abstract

English (OpenAlex)

Background/Objectives: Eltrombopag, a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, is widely used in the treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). This study aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of generic eltrombopag (Rompag®) with original eltrombopag (Revolade®) in adult patients with R/R ITP. Methods: In this prospective, multicenter study conducted at 10 centers, 104 adult ITP patients were followed for at least 3 months. A total of 35 (33.7%) patients received Rompag® and 69 (66.3%) received Revolade®. The primary endpoint was platelet (PLT) response, defined as achieving a PLT count ≥50 × 109/L and at least a twofold increase from baseline, without the need for rescue therapy or transfusion. Secondary endpoints included bleeding rates, fatigue-related quality of life, adverse events (AEs), and rescue therapy requirements. Results: PLT response was achieved in 94.2% of patients in the Revolade® group and 85.7% in the Rompag® group (p = 0.16). Bleeding rates decreased significantly in both groups (Revolade®: 56.5% to 2.9%, p < 0.001; Rompag®: 62.9% to 2.9%, p < 0.001). Although overall AE rates were similar (30.4% in the Revolade® group and 42.9% in the Rompag® group; p = 0.22), arthralgia (28.6% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.01) and vomiting (11.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.008) were more frequent with Rompag®. Conclusions: Both generic and original eltrombopag demonstrated no statistically significant difference in efficacy in achieving PLT response, reducing bleeding, and improving fatigue-related quality of life in adult patients with R/R ITP. Although minor differences in AE profiles were observed, particularly arthralgia and vomiting, both formulations showed acceptable safety and tolerability.

Topics

  • Platelet Disorders and Treatments
  • Blood groups and transfusion
  • Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis

Primary topic Platelet Disorders and Treatments

Authors

  1. SERHAT ÇELİK
  2. ZEYNEP TUĞBA KARABULUT
  3. CEM SELİM SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  4. RAFİYE ÇİFTÇİLER
  5. ABDULKERİM YILDIZ
  6. SAMET YAMAN
  7. İBRAHİM ETHEM PINAR
  8. AYŞE HİLAL EROĞLU KÜÇÜKDİLER AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  9. NURAY GÜL AÇAR
  10. AYSUN ŞENTÜRK YIKILMAZ
  11. VEHBİ DEMİRCAN
  12. DİLEK KESKİN
  13. İBRAHİM HALİL AÇAR
  14. EKİN KIRCALI
  15. Meltem KURT YÜKSEL