Skip to content
akaturk Academic measurement

Article detail · 2023

A comparative study on daily evapotranspiration estimation by using various artificial intelligence techniques and traditional regression calculations

Journal

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)

ISSN 1551-0018

The ISSN points to another catalog journal; the name is from the YÖKSİS record.

YÖKSİS OpenAlex Open access · gold SJR Q2 JCR Q2 Citations 10 Percentile 66.4% FWCI 0.87
Year
2023
Type
article

Data source split

  • YÖKSİS YÖKSİS article record
  • YÖKSİS venue American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
  • Catalog match (ISSN) Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
  • OpenAlex OpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)

Abstract

OpenAlex · English

Evapotranspiration is an important parameter to be considered in hydrology. In the design of water structures, accurate estimation of the amount of evapotranspiration allows for safer designs. Thus, maximum efficiency can be obtained from the structure. In order to accurately estimate evapotranspiration, the parameters affecting evapotranspiration should be well known. There are many factors that affect evapotranspiration. Some of these can be listed as temperature, humidity in the atmosphere, wind speed, pressure and water depth. In this study, models were created for the estimation of the daily evapotranspiration amount by using the simple membership functions and fuzzy rules generation technique (fuzzy-SMRGT), multivariate regression (MR), artificial neural networks (ANNs), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and support vector regression (SMOReg) methods. Model results were compared with each other and traditional regression calculations. The ET amount was calculated empirically using the Penman-Monteith (PM) method which was taken as a reference equation. In the created models, daily air temperature (T), wind speed (WS), solar radiation (SR), relative humidity (H) and evapotranspiration (ET) data were obtained from the station near Lake Lewisville (Texas, USA). The coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE) and average percentage error (APE) were used to compare the model results. According to the performance criteria, the best model was obtained by Q-MR (quadratic-MR), ANFIS and ANN methods. The R2, RMSE, APE values of the best models were 0,991, 0,213, 18,881% for Q-MR; 0,996; 0,103; 4,340% for ANFIS and 0,998; 0,075; 3,361% for ANN, respectively. The Q-MR, ANFIS and ANN models had slightly better performance than the MLR, P-MR and SMOReg models.

Topics

Citations

OpenAlex cited_by_count. Not a WoS or Scopus citation count; those sources have no separate column here.

10 citations

OpenAlex cited_by_count (cache / database)

2 publications in the local catalog that cite this work (OpenAlex reference match; not the full global list).

  1. Suspended Sediment Estimation Using Machine Learning Methods 2024 Citations 2 · OpenAlex
  2. Hybrid VMD-EMD Enhanced Machine Learning Models for Daily Reference Evapotranspiration Forecasting 2026 Citations 1 · OpenAlex

Authors

  1. HASAN GÜZEL
  2. FATİH ÜNEŞ İSKENDERUN TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  3. Merve Erginer
  4. YUNUS ZİYA KAYA
  5. BESTAMİ TAŞAR
  6. İbrahim Erginer
  7. MUSTAFA DEMİRCİ İSKENDERUN TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ