Skip to content
akaturk Academic measurement

Article detail · 2024 · article

Comparison of clinical features of cystic fibrosis patients eligible but not on CFTR modulators to ineligible for CFTR modulators

ISSN8755-6863
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Open access · bronze
Year2024
Citations9OpenAlex
Percentile%88.3
FWCI2.221.00 = world average
Scopus (SJR)Q1
WoS (JCR)Q2

Data source split

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS article record
  • YÖKSİS venuePediatric Pulmonology
  • Catalog match (ISSN)Pediatric Pulmonology
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)

Abstract

OpenAlex English

INTRODUCTION: Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator drugs target the underlying defect and improve CFTR function. They are a part of standard care in many countries, but not all patients are eligible for these drugs due to age and genotype. Here, we aimed to determine the characteristics of non-eligible patients for CFTR modulators in the CF registry of Turkey (CFRT) to highlight their clinical needs. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included CF patient data from the CFRT in 2021. The decision of eligibility for the CFTR modulator was determined according to the 'Vertex treatment-Finder' on the Vertex® website. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients were compared between eligible (group 1) and ineligible (group 2) groups for CFTR modulators. RESULTS: Among the study population (N = 1527), 873 (57.2%) were in group 1 and 654 (42.8%) were in group 2. There was no statistical difference between groups regarding sex, meconium ileus history, diagnoses via newborn screening, FEV1 z-score, CF-associated complications, organ transplant history, and death. Patients in group 2 had a higher incidence of pancreatic insufficiency (87.7% vs. 83.2%, p = .010), lower median height z-scores (-0.87 vs. -0.55, p < .001), lower median body mass index z-scores (-0.65 vs. -0.50, p < .001), longer days receiving antibiotics due to pulmonary exacerbation (0 [interquartile range, IQR: 0-2] vs. 0 [IQR: 0-7], p = 0.001), and more non-invasive ventilation support (2.6% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.008) than patients in group 1. CONCLUSION: The ineligible group had worse clinical outcomes than the eligible group. This highlights their need for life-changing drugs to improve clinical outcomes.

Topics

Citations

OpenAlex cited_by_count. Not a WoS or Scopus citation count; those sources have no separate column here.

9citationsOpenAlex · cited_by_count (cache / database)

24 publications in the local catalog that cite this work (OpenAlex reference match; not the full global list).

  1. 2024 Effect of Modulator Therapies on Nutritional Risk Index in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis: A Prospective Cohort StudyCitations 5 · OpenAlex
  2. 2024 Effect of Modulator Therapies on Nutritional Risk Index in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis: A Prospective Cohort Study.Citations 5 · OpenAlex
  3. 2024 Effect of Modulator Therapies on Nutritional Risk Index in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis: A Prospective Cohort StudyCitations 5 · OpenAlex
  4. 2024 Effect of Modulator Therapies on Nutritional Risk Index in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis: A Prospective Cohort StudyCitations 5 · OpenAlex
  5. 2024 Evaluation of otorhinolaryngologic, audiologic, and genetic findings in children with cystic fibrosis: A tertiary care experienceCitations 1 · OpenAlex
  6. 2024 Evaluation of otorhinolaryngologic, audiologic, and genetic findings in children with cystic fibrosis: A tertiary care experienceCitations 1 · OpenAlex
  7. 2024 Evaluation of otorhinolaryngologic, audiologic, and genetic findings in children with cystic fibrosis: A tertiary care experienceCitations 1 · OpenAlex
  8. 2024 Evaluation of otorhinolaryngologic, audiologic, and genetic findings in children with cystic fibrosis: A tertiary care experienceCitations 1 · OpenAlex
  9. 2024 Evaluation of otorhinolaryngologic, audiologic, and genetic findings in children with cystic fibrosis: A tertiary care experienceCitations 1 · OpenAlex
  10. 2024 Evaluation of otorhinolaryngologic, audiologic, and genetic findings in children with cystic fibrosis: A tertiary care experienceCitations 1 · OpenAlex

Authors

55
  1. HALİME NAYIR BÜYÜKŞAHİN 1
  2. NAGEHAN EMİRALİOĞLU ORDUKAYA 2
  3. ELMAS EBRU YALÇIN 3
  4. VELAT ŞEN 4
  5. HADİCE SELİMOĞLU ŞEN 5
  6. HÜSEYİN ARSLAN 6
  7. AZER KILIÇ BAŞKAN 7
  8. FATMA BETÜL ÇAKIR 8
  9. cem fırat koray 9
  10. ASLI İMRAN YILMAZ 10
  11. FATİH ERCAN 11
  12. DERYA UFUK ALTINTAŞ 12
  13. MAHİR SERBES ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ 13
  14. ÖZLEM KESKİN GAZİANTEP ÜNİVERSİTESİ 14
  15. ELİF ARIK 15
  16. FİGEN GÜLEN 16
  17. MERAL BARLIK 17
  18. OĞUZ KARCIOĞLU 18
  19. EBRU DAMADOĞLU 19
  20. MEHMET KÖSE 20
  21. ALİ ERSOY 21
  22. AYŞEN BİNGÖL 22
  23. ABDURRAHMAN ERDEM BAŞARAN 23
  24. EYLÜL PINAR ÇAKIR 24
  25. AYŞE TANA ASLAN 25
  26. YAKUP CANITEZ 26
  27. MERVE KORKMAZ 27
  28. ÖZMERT MUHAMMET ALİ ÖZDEMİR 28
  29. KORAY HARMANCI 29
  30. şule selin soydaş 30
  31. MELİH HANGÜL 31
  32. HASAN YÜKSEL 32
  33. GİZEM ÖZCAN CEREN 33
  34. PERVİN KORKMAZ 34
  35. MEHMET KILIÇ 35
  36. ZEYNEP GÖKÇE GAYRETLİ AYDIN 36
  37. GÖNÜL ÇALTEPE ONDOKUZ MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ 37
  38. DEMET CAN 38
  39. SİBEL DOĞRU GAZİANTEP ÜNİVERSİTESİ 39
  40. GÖKÇEN KARTAL ÖZTÜRK 40
  41. AYŞE SÜLEYMAN 41
  42. ERDEM TOPAL İNÖNÜ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 42
  43. BESTE ÖZSEZEN 43
  44. MİNA HIZAL 44
  45. EZGİ DEMİRDÖĞEN BURSA ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 45
  46. HAMZA OGUN 46
  47. ŞERMİN BÖREKÇİ 47
  48. HAKAN YAZAN 48
  49. ERKAN ÇAKIR İSTİNYE ÜNİVERSİTESİ 49
  50. TUĞBA ŞİŞMANLAR EYÜBOĞLU 50
  51. FATMA NAZAN ÇOBANOĞLU 51
  52. GÜZİN CİNEL 52
  53. SEVGİ PEKCAN 53
  54. HAYRİYE UĞUR ÖZÇELİK 54
  55. DENİZ DOĞRU ERSÖZ 55