Skip to content
akaturk Academic measurement

Article detail · 2007

Soluble forms of extracellular cytokeratin 18 may differentiate simple steatosis from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

Journal

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN 1007-9327

YÖKSİS OpenAlex SJR Q1 JCR Q1 Citations 169 Top 10% Percentile 98.3% FWCI 8.81
Year
2007
Type
article

Data source split

  • YÖKSİS YÖKSİS article record
  • YÖKSİS venue WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
  • Catalog match (ISSN) World Journal of Gastroenterology
  • OpenAlex OpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)

Abstract

OpenAlex · English

AIM: To investigate whether serum levels of two soluble forms of extracellular cytokeratin 18 (M30-antigen and M65-antigen) may differentiate nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) from simple steatosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). METHODS: A total of 83 patients with suspected NAFLD and 49 healthy volunteers were investigated. Patients with suspected NAFLD were classified according to their liver histology into four groups: definitive NASH (n=45), borderline NASH (n=24), simple fatty liver (n=9), and normal tissue (n=5). Serum levels of caspase-3 generated cytokeratin-18 fragments (M30-antigen) and total cytokeratin-18 (M65-antigen) were determined by ELISA. RESULTS: Levels of M30-antigen and M65-antigen were significantly higher in patients with definitive NASH compared to the other groups. An abnormal value (> 121.60 IU/L) of M30-antigen yielded a 60.0% sensitivity and a 97.4% specificity for the diagnosis of NASH. Sensitivity and specificity of an abnormal M65-antigen level (> 243.82 IU/L) for the diagnosis of NASH were 68.9% and 81.6%, respectively. Among patients with NAFLD, M30-antigen and M65-antigen levels distinguished between advanced fibrosis and early-stage fibrosis with a sensitivity of 64.7% and 70.6%, and a specificity of 77.3% and 71.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Serum levels of M30-antigen and M65-antigen may be of clinical usefulness to identify patients with NASH. Further studies are mandatory to better assess the role of these apoptonecrotic biomarkers in NAFLD pathophysiology.

Topics

Citations

OpenAlex cited_by_count. Not a WoS or Scopus citation count; those sources have no separate column here.

169 citations

OpenAlex cited_by_count (cache / database)

22 publications in the local catalog that cite this work (OpenAlex reference match; not the full global list).

  1. Apoptosis: why and how does it occur in biology? 2011 Citations 228 · OpenAlex
  2. Serum concentrations of human insulin-like growth factor-1 and levels of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-5 in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease 2012 Citations 46 · OpenAlex
  3. Serum concentrations of human insulin like growth factor 1 and levels of insulin like growth factor binding protein 5 in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease 2012 Citations 46 · OpenAlex
  4. Cytokeratin-18 fragments and biomarkers of the metabolic syndrome in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis 2009 Citations 38 · OpenAlex
  5. A glance at the methods for detection of apoptosis qualitatively and quantitatively 2011 Citations 34 · OpenAlex
  6. Is Alanine Aminotransferase Level a Surrogate Biomarker of Hepatic Apoptosis in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease? 2010 Citations 20 · OpenAlex
  7. Serum M30 levels: A potential biomarker of severe liver disease in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and normal aminotransferase levels 2009 Citations 17 · OpenAlex
  8. A “Biomarker Biopsy” for the Diagnosis of NASH: Promises from CK-18 Fragments 2008 Citations 16 · OpenAlex
  9. Caspase-cleaved fragments of cytokeratin 18 in patients with chronic hepatitis B 2010 Citations 15 · OpenAlex
  10. Serial changes in circulating M30 antigen, a biomarker of apoptosis, in patients with acute coronary syndromes: relationship with the severity of coronary artery disease 2009 Citations 12 · OpenAlex

Authors

  1. YUSUF YILMAZ
  2. MAHMUT ENVER DOLAR
  3. ENGİN ULUKAYA
  4. SEMRA AKGÖZ
  5. Murat Keskin
  6. MURAT KIYICI
  7. Sibel Aker
  8. ARZU YILMAZTEPE ORAL BURSA ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  9. SELİM GÜREL
  10. MACİT GÜLTEN
  11. SELİM GİRAY NAK