Skip to content
akaturk Academic measurement

Article detail · 2017

Comparison of GnRH antagonist and agonist mini-dose long protocols in infertile cases undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY

YÖKSİS OpenAlex Open access · bronze SJR Q3 JCR Q4 Citations 0 Percentile 30.8% FWCI 0.0
Year
2017
ISSN
0390-6663
Type
article

Data source split

  • YÖKSİS YÖKSİS article record
  • OpenAlex OpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)

Abstract

English (OpenAlex)

AIM: The purpose of the present study was to determine if there is a difference between multi-dose gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol and long GnRH agonist protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study compared the data pertaining to patients chosen as per predetermined acceptance criteria, 113 of whom were administered multi-dose antagonist protocol for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) while 133 were administered long agonist protocol for COH at Suleymaniye Teaching Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology. RESULTS: While cancellation rate was found to be significantly higher in antagonist group (17.7% vs 11.28%), the number of follicles > 14 mm and > 16 mm, E2 level, and the number of retrieved oocytes on the day of hCG trigger were significantly lower in the same group. However, there was no difference between fertilization rates and embryonic development rates. The pregnancy rates per transfer and per cycle were found to be 40.9% and 31.7%, respectively; in the antagonist group they were lower, though not significantly, when compared to agonist group (44.1% and 39.1%, respectively). Ongoing pregnancy rates were found to be similar between the groups. CONCLUSION: GnRH antagonist treatment protocol has a level of efficacy similar to agonist treatment protocol in terms of pregnancy results for all groups.

Topics

  • Ovarian function and disorders
  • Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility

Primary topic Ovarian function and disorders

Authors

  1. H. Akin
  2. S. Kumbasar
  3. B. A. Sik
  4. S. Salman
  5. MUZAFFER TEMÜR İSTANBUL KENT ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  6. F. Cakiroglu
  7. R. Ozyurt
  8. M. Kucukbas
  9. FUNDA PINAR ÇAKIROĞLU ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ