Skip to content
akaturk Academic measurement

Article detail · 2024

Impact of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio on Stroke Severity and Clinical Outcome in Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke

Diagnostics

YÖKSİS OpenAlex Open access · gold SJR Q2 JCR Q1 Citations 6 Percentile 85.4% FWCI 1.63
Year
2024
ISSN
2075-4418
Type
article

Data source split

  • YÖKSİS YÖKSİS article record
  • OpenAlex OpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)

Abstract

English (OpenAlex)

Background: The prognostic value of the neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in ischemic stroke remains debated due to cohort variability and treatment heterogeneity across studies. This study evaluates the relationship between admission NLR, stroke severity and 90-day outcomes in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) undergoing early, successful revascularization. Methods: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted with 1082 patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. The relationship between admission NLR, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), 24 h NIHSS and 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) outcomes was analyzed using logistic regression. Results: Admission NLR correlated weakly but significantly with both baseline (p = 0.018) and 24 h (p = 0.005) NIHSS scores, reflecting stroke severity. However, multivariate analysis showed that higher 24 h NIHSS scores (OR 0.831, p = 0.000) and prolonged puncture-to-recanalization times (OR 0.981, p = 0.000) were independent predictors of poor 90-day outcomes, whereas NLR was not (p = 0.557). Conclusions: Admission NLR is associated with stroke severity but does not independently predict clinical outcomes at 90 days in patients achieving early and successful revascularization. These findings underscore the critical role of inflammation in the acute phase of stroke but suggest that its prognostic value for long-term outcomes is limited in this context.

Topics

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Primary topic Acute Ischemic Stroke Management

Authors

  1. ZÜLFİKAR MEMİŞ
  2. ERDEM GÜRKAŞ
  3. ATİLLA ÖZCAN ÖZDEMİR ESKİŞEHİR OSMANGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  4. BİLGEHAN ATILGAN ACAR SAKARYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  5. MUHAMMED NUR ÖGÜN BOLU ABANT İZZET BAYSAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  6. EMRAH AYTAÇ
  7. ÇETİN KÜRŞAD AKPINAR
  8. EŞREF AKIL
  9. MURAT ÇABALAR
  10. AYÇA ÖZKUL
  11. ÜMİT GÖRGÜLÜ
  12. HASAN BAYINDIR
  13. ZAUR MEHDİYEV
  14. ŞENNUR DELİBAŞ KATI
  15. RECEP BAYDEMİR
  16. AHMET YABALAK
  17. AYŞENUR ÖNALAN
  18. TÜRKAN ACAR
  19. ÖZLEM AYKAÇ
  20. ZEHRA UYSAL KOCABAŞ
  21. SERHAN YILDIRIM
  22. HASAN DOĞAN
  23. MEHMET SEMİH ARI
  24. MUSTAFA ÇETİNER
  25. FERHAT BALGETİR
  26. FETTAH EREN
  27. ALPER EREN ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  28. NAZIM KIZILDAĞ ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  29. UTKU CANİKLİ
  30. AYSEL BÜŞRA ŞİŞMAN BAYAR
  31. EBRU TEMEL
  32. ALİHAN ABDULLAH AKBAŞ
  33. EMİNE SAYGIN UYSAL
  34. HAMZA GÜLTEKİN DİCLE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  35. CEBRAİL DURMAZ
  36. SENA BONCUK ULAŞ
  37. TALİP ASIL