Skip to content
akaturk Academic measurement

Article detail · 2023 · article

Comparison of Ten Different Mathematical Models Used in In-Vitro Gas Production Technique

Journal Black Sea Journal of Agriculture
ISSN2618-6578
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Open access · bronze TR Index
Year2023
Citations0OpenAlex
Percentile%12.1
FWCI0.01.00 = world average

Data source split

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS article record
  • YÖKSİS venueBlack Sea Journal of Agriculture
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)
  • Semantic Scholarcitation count (not merged with OpenAlex)

Abstract

OpenAlex English

In this study, the usability of models commonly used in in vitro gas production techniques in different feed sources was comparatively investigated. For this purpose, Richard, Logistic, Orskov, Verhulst, Janoschek, Weibull, Bridges, Mitscherling, Monomolecular and Von Bertalanffy models, which are widely used in the literature, were used. In comparing these models, criteria such as mean square error (MSE), coefficient of determination(𝑅2), corrected coefficient of determination (R ̅^2), accuracy factor (AF), bias factor (BF), Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) were used. As a result of the research, according to these criteria, the best model in Arbutus andrachne plant was determined as Richard, and the worst model was determined as Janoscheck and Weibull model. For Arbutus unedo, Ceratonia siliqua and Laurus nobilis L. plants, the best models were determined as Orskov, Mitscherling, Monomolecular and Von Bertalanffy models, and the worst models were Logistic and Verhulst models.

Topics

Citations

OpenAlex cited_by_count. Not a WoS or Scopus citation count; those sources have no separate column here.

0citationsOpenAlex · cited_by_count (cache / database)

Authors

1
  1. MUSTAFA ŞAHİN KAHRAMANMARAŞ SÜTÇÜ İMAM ÜNİVERSİTESİ 1