Skip to content
akaturk Academic measurement

Article detail · 2025

Significance of Preoperative Multidisciplinary Assessment with 30-Second Sit-to-Stand and Timed Up-and-Go Tests in Predicting Postoperative Outcomes

Journal

Journal of Clinical Medicine

ISSN 2077-0383

YÖKSİS OpenAlex Open access · gold SJR Q2 JCR Q1 Citations 5 Top 10% Percentile 92.7% FWCI 3.54
Year
2025
Type
article

Data source split

  • YÖKSİS YÖKSİS article record
  • YÖKSİS venue Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Catalog match (ISSN) Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • OpenAlex OpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)

Abstract

English (OpenAlex)

Background/Objectives: Evaluating basic daily activities like sitting, standing, and walking is crucial for predicting preoperative risks and postoperative recovery. These functional abilities can be assessed through patient history or measured using objective tests. For this purpose, the 30-Second Sit-to-Stand (30STS) Test and Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) Test are frequently used in clinical settings. However, few studies have evaluated their effectiveness in anesthesia and orthopedics. In this study, we aimed to assess the applicability of these tests across clinical disciplines. Methods: A total of 43 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery between January and December 2023 with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores of 2–3 were retrospectively evaluated. The 30STS, TUG, and VAS scores were recorded preoperatively and on postoperative days 90–180. Results: The preoperative 30STS and TUG scores showed no statistically significant difference between the ASA 2–3 groups, but the ASA 2 group demonstrated a more pronounced performance improvement in both tests during the first 90 days postoperatively. The correlation tests revealed a strong positive relationship with the TUG Test and a moderate positive relationship with the 30STS and VAS scores. Conclusions: The correlation between the preoperative and postoperative results of the 30STS and TUG Tests suggests that preoperative tests can predict post-operative functional performance. However, the lack of a significant statistical relationship between the preoperative tests and ASA scores indicates that these tests may not be sufficiently useful for assessing the functional capacity. The better test outcomes in the ASA 2 patients indicate that combining these assessments with anesthetic evaluations may improve postoperative functional predictions, thereby promoting a multidisciplinary approach.

Topics

  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Primary topic Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes

Authors

  1. MÜCAHİD OSMAN YÜCEL DÜZCE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  2. SÖNMEZ SAĞLAM DÜZCE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  3. RAŞİT EMİN DALASLAN DÜZCE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  4. MEHMET ARICAN
  5. ZEKERİYA OKAN KARADUMAN DÜZCE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  6. BEDRETTİN AKAR
  7. MÜCAHİT ÇELİK
  8. İSMAİL SAV