Article detail · 2016
Which Should be Preferred for Moderate-Size Kidney Stones? Ultramini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy or Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery?
- Year
- 2016
- Type
- article
Data source split
- YÖKSİS YÖKSİS article record
- YÖKSİS venue Journal of Endourology
- Catalog match (ISSN) Journal of Endourology
- OpenAlex OpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)
Abstract
OpenAlex · English
PURPOSE: Comparison of effectiveness and safety of ultramini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMPNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in treatment of moderate-sized renal stones. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The patients scheduled for surgery attributable to renal stones with the greatest diameter of 10 to 25 mm were prospectively analyzed. Patients were randomized into groups with tossing a coin method. The patients who had UMPNL and RIRS were defined as Group I and Group II, respectively. The groups were compared for demograhic data, stone characteristics, operative and postoperative data, stone-free status, and the complications. Student's t-test and Pearson's Chi square tests were used for statistical analysis. p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: There were 30 patients in Group I, and 43 patients in Group II. The groups were similar for age, gender, side of the stone, and surface area characteristics of the stone (p = 0.194, p = 0.470, p = 0.990, and p = 0.487, respectively). Stone-free rate was 80% (n = 24) in UMPNL, and 74.4% (n = 32) in RIRS (p = 0.579). Modified Clavien Classification Grade 1 to 2 and 3A to 3B complications were similar in two groups (p = 0.959 and p = 0.192, respectively). Comparison of stone-free rates was 93.3% in UMPNL, and 42.9% in RIRS groups for lower pole stones (p = 0.009). Groups I and II were significantly different for visual analog scale scores for postoperative pain (4.73 ± 1.25 vs 2.30 ± 1.12), hospital stay (2.46 ± 3.02 vs 1.37 ± 1.48 days), and time to return to normal daily life (11.26 ± 5.55 vs 6.65 ± 4.30 days) (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both UMPNL and RIRS procedures are effective and safe methods in treatment of middle-sized renal stones. However, UMPNL is more effective than RIRS in treatment of lower pole stones. RIRS is more advantageous when loss from work is taken into consideration.
Topics
Citations
OpenAlex cited_by_count. Not a WoS or Scopus citation count; those sources have no separate column here.
29 citations
OpenAlex cited_by_count (cache / database)
3 publications in the local catalog that cite this work (OpenAlex reference match; not the full global list).
- Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the management of renal calculi ≤ 2 cm: a propensity matched study 2021
- Is Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery as Safe for Children as It Is for Adults? 2021
- Individualized Management of 1-2 cm Kidney Stones in the Lower Pole Calyces 2023