Skip to content
akaturk Academic measurement

Article detail · 2026

Computed tomography densitometry for discriminating between type 1 hydatid and simple hepatic cysts

YÖKSİS OpenAlex Open access · gold SJR Q3 JCR Q3 Citations 0 Percentile 77.3% FWCI 0.0
Year
2026
Type
article

Data source split

  • YÖKSİS YÖKSİS article record
  • YÖKSİS venue Journal of International Medical Research
  • Catalog match (ISSN) Journal of International Medical Research
  • OpenAlex OpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)

Abstract

OpenAlex · English

Objective Differentiation of simple and type 1 hepatic hydatid cysts is challenging because of their similar contents and radiological appearance. We aimed to compare the density values of simple and Type 1 hepatic hydatid cysts measured on computed tomography. Methods Patients with histopathologically, serologically, or macroscopically confirmed Type 1 hydatid or simple hepatic cysts were included in the study. Mean density values, expressed in Hounsfield units, were measured on axial images of contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography scans. The results of the two groups were compared using statistical analysis, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 51 Type 1 hydatid and 36 simple cysts were included in the study. The mean age of patients with hydatid cysts was significantly lower than that of patients with simple cysts (p = 0.015). The mean diameter of lesions in the hydatid group was significantly larger than that in the simple cyst group (p < 0.001 ) . Multiple-segment extension, as well as involvement of segments I, II, III, V, VI, and VII, was more common in the hydatid group, whereas involvement of segments IV and VIII was more frequent in the simple cyst group. The mean density of hydatid cysts (9.2 ± 8.8 Hounsfield units) was slightly higher than that of simple cysts (7.3 ± 6.5 Hounsfield units), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.301). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 54.6%. Male gender (p = 0.026) and younger patient age (p = 0.002) were significantly associated with the presence of a hydatid cyst. Additionally, increasing lesion size positively correlated with the likelihood of a hydatid cyst diagnosis (p = 0.001). Conclusion Computed tomography densitometry is not a reliable tool for discriminating between Type 1 hydatid and simple hepatic cysts, consistent with previous findings for other quantitative measurements using magnetic resonance imaging and elastosonography. Additionally, younger male patients with larger cysts were more likely to have a diagnosis of hepatic hydatid cyst.

Topics

Citations

OpenAlex cited_by_count. Not a WoS or Scopus citation count; those sources have no separate column here.

0 citations

OpenAlex cited_by_count (cache / database)

Authors

  1. SERCAN ÖZKAÇMAZ VAN YÜZÜNCÜ YIL ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  2. MESUT ÖZGÖKÇE VAN YÜZÜNCÜ YIL ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  3. ENES ÖZEL
  4. FATMA DURMAZ VAN YÜZÜNCÜ YIL ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  5. AYŞE ÖZKAÇMAZ VAN YÜZÜNCÜ YIL ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  6. YENER AYDIN ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  7. İLYAS DÜNDAR VAN YÜZÜNCÜ YIL ÜNİVERSİTESİ