Skip to content
akaturk Academic measurement

Article detail · 2024 · review

Key concepts and a world‐wide look at plant recruitment networks

ISSN1464-7931
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Open access · hybrid
Year2024
Citations11OpenAlex
Citations10Semantic Scholar
Percentile%72.6
FWCI1.071.00 = world average
Scopus (SJR)Q1
WoS (JCR)Q1

Data source split

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS article record
  • YÖKSİS venueBiological Reviews
  • Catalog match (ISSN)Biological Reviews
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)
  • Semantic Scholarcitation count (not merged with OpenAlex)

Abstract

OpenAlex English

Plant-plant interactions are major determinants of the dynamics of terrestrial ecosystems. There is a long tradition in the study of these interactions, their mechanisms and their consequences using experimental, observational and theoretical approaches. Empirical studies overwhelmingly focus at the level of species pairs or small sets of species. Although empirical data on these interactions at the community level are scarce, such studies have gained pace in the last decade. Studying plant-plant interactions at the community level requires knowledge of which species interact with which others, so an ecological networks approach must be incorporated into the basic toolbox of plant community ecology. The concept of recruitment networks (RNs) provides an integrative framework and new insights for many topics in the field of plant community ecology. RNs synthesise the set of canopy-recruit interactions in a local plant assemblage. Canopy-recruit interactions describe which ("canopy") species allow the recruitment of other species in their vicinity and how. Here we critically review basic concepts of ecological network theory as they apply to RNs. We use RecruitNet, a recently published worldwide data set of canopy-recruit interactions, to describe RN patterns emerging at the interaction, species, and community levels, and relate them to different abiotic gradients. Our results show that RNs can be sampled with high accuracy. The studies included in RecruitNet show a very high mean network completeness (95%), indicating that undetected canopy-recruit pairs must be few and occur very infrequently. Across 351,064 canopy-recruit pairs analysed, the effect of the interaction on recruitment was neutral in an average of 69% of the interactions per community, but the remaining interactions were positive (i.e. facilitative) five times more often than negative (i.e. competitive), and positive interactions had twice the strength of negative ones. Moreover, the frequency and strength of facilitation increases along a climatic aridity gradient worldwide, so the demography of plant communities is increasingly strongly dependent on facilitation as aridity increases. At network level, species can be ascribed to four functional types depending on their position in the network: core, satellite, strict transients and disturbance-dependent transients. This functional structure can allow a rough estimation of which species are more likely to persist. In RecruitNet communities, this functional structure most often departs from random null model expectation and could allow on average the persistence of 77% of the species in a local community. The functional structure of RNs also varies along the aridity gradient, but differently in shrubland than in forest communities. This variation suggests an increase in the probability of species persistence with aridity in forests, while such probability remains roughly constant along the gradient in shrublands. The different functional structure of RNs between forests and shrublands could contribute to explaining their co-occurrence as alternative stable states of the vegetation under the same climatic conditions. This review is not exhaustive of all the topics that can be addressed using the framework of RNs, but instead aims to present some of the interesting insights that it can bring to the field of plant community ecology.

Topics

Citations

OpenAlex cited_by_count. Not a WoS or Scopus citation count; those sources have no separate column here.

11citationsOpenAlex · cited_by_count (cache / database)

Authors

80
  1. Julio M. Alcántara 1
  2. Miguel Verdú 2
  3. José L. Garrido 3
  4. Alicia Montesinos‐Navarro 4
  5. Marcelo A Aizen 5
  6. Mohamed Alifriqui 6
  7. Ali A Al‐Namazi 7
  8. David Allen 8
  9. Cristina Armas 9
  10. Jesús M Bastida 10
  11. Tono Bellido 11
  12. Gustavo Brant Paterno 12
  13. Herbert Briceño 13
  14. Ricardo A Camargo de Oliveira 14
  15. Josefina G Campoy 15
  16. Ghassen Chaieb 16
  17. Chengjin Chu 17
  18. Elena Constantinou 18
  19. Léo Delalandre 19
  20. Milen Duarte 20
  21. Michel Faife‐Cabrera 21
  22. FATİH FAZLIOĞLU 22
  23. Edwino S Fernando 23
  24. Joel Flores 24
  25. Hilda Flores‐Olvera 25
  26. Ecaterina Fodor 26
  27. Gislene Ganade 27
  28. Maria B Garcia 28
  29. Patricio García‐Fayos 29
  30. Sabrina S Gavini 30
  31. Marta Goberna 31
  32. Lorena Gómez‐Aparicio 32
  33. Enrique González‐Pendás 33
  34. Ana González‐Robles 34
  35. KAHRAMAN İPEKDAL HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ 35
  36. Zaal Kikvidze 36
  37. Alicia Ledo 37
  38. Sandra Lendínez 38
  39. Hanlun Liu 39
  40. Francisco Lloret 40
  41. Ramiro P López 41
  42. Álvaro López‐García 42
  43. Christopher J Lortie 43
  44. Gianalberto Losapio 44
  45. James A Lutz 45
  46. František Máliš 46
  47. Antonio J Manzaneda 47
  48. Vinicius Marcilio‐Silva 48
  49. Richard Michalet 49
  50. Rafael Molina‐Venegas 50
  51. José A Navarro‐Cano 51
  52. Vojtech Novotny 52
  53. Jens M Olesen 53
  54. Juan P Ortiz‐Brunel 54
  55. Mariona Pajares‐Murgó 55
  56. Antonio J Perea 56
  57. Vidal Pérez‐Hernández 57
  58. María Ángeles Pérez‐Navarro 58
  59. Nuria Pistón 59
  60. Iván Prieto 60
  61. Jorge Prieto‐Rubio 61
  62. Francisco I Pugnaire 62
  63. Nelson Ramírez 63
  64. Rubén Retuerto 64
  65. Pedro J Rey 65
  66. Daniel A Rodriguez‐Ginart 66
  67. Ricardo Sánchez‐Martín 67
  68. ÇAĞATAY TAVŞANOĞLU 68
  69. Giorgi Tedoradze 69
  70. Amanda Tercero‐Araque 70
  71. Katja Tielbörger 71
  72. Blaise Touzard 72
  73. İrem Tüfekcioğlu 73
  74. SEVDA TÜRKİŞ 74
  75. Francisco M Usero 75
  76. Nurbahar Usta‐Baykal 76
  77. Alfonso Valiente‐Banuet 77
  78. Alexa Vargas‐Colin 78
  79. Ioannis Vogiatzakis 79
  80. Regino Zamora 80