Skip to content
akaturk Academic measurement

Article detail · 2024 · article

Comparison of Screws with Different Diameters in Subperiosteal Implant Application with Finite Element Analysis

YÖKSİS OpenAlex Open access · gold Top 10%
Year2024
Citations8OpenAlex
Citations9Semantic Scholar · 2 influential
Percentile%92.6
FWCI3.191.00 = world average
Scopus (SJR)Q2
WoS (JCR)Q1

Data source split

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS article record
  • YÖKSİS venueInternational Journal of Medical Sciences
  • Catalog match (ISSN)International Journal of Medical Sciences
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)
  • Semantic Scholarcitation count (not merged with OpenAlex)

Abstract

OpenAlex English

Purpose: This study aimed to assess subperiosteal implants concerning bone stress and screw displacement, utilizing finite element analysis to determine the optimal screw diameter for enhanced bone support.Methods: Computed tomography data were translated into STL format, generating two skull models.Subperiosteal implants were constructed on these models and placed accordingly.Employing the finite element analysis method, screws with 1.5 mm and 2 mm diameter were inserted into one of the models to evaluate their impact under a 250 N chewing force.Results: The 2 mm screw demonstrated superior performance compared to the 1.5 mm variant, showcasing reduced residual stress on the bone and implant.However, the 1.5 mm screw exhibited less implant movement.Conclusion: The finite element analysis suggests the 2 mm screw diameter as more advantageous over the 1.5 mm variant for subperiosteal implants.Nevertheless, this investigation marks the initial stages in exploring this treatment option's potential.

Topics

Citations

OpenAlex cited_by_count. Not a WoS or Scopus citation count; those sources have no separate column here.

8citationsOpenAlex · cited_by_count (cache / database)

6 publications in the local catalog that cite this work (OpenAlex reference match; not the full global list).

  1. 2025 Biomechanical evaluation of prosthetic framework materials in subperiosteal implants: a finite element analysisCitations 4 · OpenAlex
  2. 2025 Biomechanical evaluation of conventional, zygomatic, zygomatic bone anchored subperiosteal and maxilla anchored subperiosteal implants applied totally edentulous maxilla: finite element stress analysisCitations 4 · OpenAlex
  3. 2025 Impact of framework material, cantilever design, and wing configuration on stress distribution in patient specific additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implants: a 3D finite element analysisCitations 3 · OpenAlex
  4. 2026 Comparison of biomechanical performance of custom implants with different designs under functional load: a finite element analysisCitations 0 · OpenAlex
  5. 2026 Biomechanical comparison of titanium and Y-TZP subperiosteal implants in atrophic maxilla: a finite element studyCitations 0 · OpenAlex
  6. 2026 Comparison of biomechanical performance of custom implants with different designs under functional load: a finite element analysisCitations 0 · OpenAlex

Authors

2
  1. ABDULSAMET KUNDAKÇIOĞLU 1
  2. BETÜL GEDİK TARHAN İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ 2