Skip to content
akaturk Academic measurement

Article detail · 2023 · article

Youtube videos as a source of information on digital indirect bonding: a content analysis

ISSN2630-6158
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Open access · diamond TR Index
Year2023
Citations4OpenAlex
Percentile%53.3
FWCI0.371.00 = world average
Scopus (SJR)Q3
WoS (JCR)Q3

Data source split

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS article record
  • YÖKSİS venueEuropean Oral Research
  • Catalog match (ISSN)European Oral Research
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)

Abstract

OpenAlex English

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate YouTube videos as a source of information for digital indirect bonding techniques. Materials and methods: The keyword "digital indirect bonding" was first searched on YouTube, resulting in 57 recorded videos. Descriptive parameters, including source, target audience, purpose, duration, upload date, number of likes, dislikes, views, and comments, were then evaluated. After this initial assessment, the interaction index and viewing rate were calculated. Video content quality was determined using a 5-point scale that categorized videos as having poor, moderate, or good content quality. This rating was based on the presence and discussion of various topics related to digital indirect bonding, including digital scan, digital bracket placement, transfer tray production from a 3D-printed model or direct production as a 3D-printed tray, clinical application, and advantages and/or disadvantages. The videos were assessed for quality using the global quality scale (GQS) and video information and quality index (VIQI). Statistical evaluation was conducted using Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square, and Pearson correlation analysis, and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the rating reliability. Results: The majority of the videos were classified as having poor content quality (41.9%), followed by moderate (38.7%) and good (19.4%) content quality. No significant differences were found between the videos in terms of descriptive parameters. However, videos with good content quality had significantly higher GQS and VIQI scores than moderate and poor content videos. The total content showed significant correlations with GQS and VIQI (r=0.780 and r=0.446, respectively; plt;0.05). Conclusion: In conclusion, while the majority of YouTube videos regarding digital indirect bonding were of poor content quality, those that were of good content quality could be considered a useful source of professional information.

Topics

Citations

OpenAlex cited_by_count. Not a WoS or Scopus citation count; those sources have no separate column here.

4citationsOpenAlex · cited_by_count (cache / database)

1 publications in the local catalog that cite this work (OpenAlex reference match; not the full global list).

  1. 2025 Is YouTube a reliable source for learning pre-endodontic build-up? A cross-sectional studyCitations 1 · OpenAlex

Authors

2
  1. SERPİL ÇOKAKOĞLU PAMUKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ 1
  2. EZGİ ÇAKIR 2