Skip to content
akaturk Academic measurement

Article detail · 2020 · article

Analysis of the quality, reliability, and popularity of information on strabismus on YouTube

Journal Strabismus
ISSN0927-3972
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Top 1%
Year2020
Citations79OpenAlex
Citations78Semantic Scholar · 8 influential
Percentile%99.1
FWCI14.281.00 = world average
Scopus (SJR)Q3

Data source split

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS article record
  • YÖKSİS venueStrabismus
  • Catalog match (ISSN)Strabismus
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)
  • Semantic Scholarcitation count (not merged with OpenAlex)

Abstract

OpenAlex English

To evaluate the quality, reliability, and popularity of YouTube videos addressing strabismus. This is a retrospective, cross-sectional, register-based study. A search was performed using the keywords "strabismus," "squint," "eye squint," and "crossed eye" on YouTube, and the first 50 videos for each keyword were analyzed. The video duration, time since upload, number of total views, view ratio were recorded. Video popularity was recorded using the video power index (VPI). Video educational quality and reliability were measured using the DISCERN questionnaire, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) score, and Global Quality Score (GQS). All videos were also assigned publishers and categories. Among the 200 videos analyzed, 84 were included. The mean duration was 6.2 min, and the mean number of total views was 227,226. The mean VPI score was 189.6 ± 1093.5 (range, 0-11631). The mean DISCERN score, JAMA score, and GQS were 42.2 ± 15.3, 1.9 ± 1.2, and 2.7 ± 1.1, respectively. While the main video publishers were patients (32.1%) and ophthalmologists (28.5%), the main video categories were patient experience (35.7%) and patient information (26.1%). While the most popular videos were uploaded by a TV show/YouTube channel, the videos with the highest educational quality and reliability scores were uploaded by academic institutions. Although some videos contained sufficient information, most of the videos were rated as fair. YouTube users mostly preferred videos that were of low quality. Patients may be receiving biased information, and physicians should be aware of the type of information patients may be accessing on YouTube.

Topics

Citations

OpenAlex cited_by_count. Not a WoS or Scopus citation count; those sources have no separate column here.

79citationsOpenAlex · cited_by_count (cache / database)

58 publications in the local catalog that cite this work (OpenAlex reference match; not the full global list).

  1. 2021 Educational quality of YouTube videos on musculoskeletal ultrasoundCitations 41 · OpenAlex
  2. 2021 Educational quality of YouTube videos on musculoskeletal ultrasoundCitations 41 · OpenAlex
  3. 2023 YouTube as an information source in paediatric dentistry education: Reliability and quality analysisCitations 37 · OpenAlex
  4. 2023 YouTube as an information source in paediatric dentistry education: Reliability and quality analysisCitations 37 · OpenAlex
  5. 2023 YouTube as an information source in paediatric dentistry education: Reliability and quality analysisCitations 37 · OpenAlex
  6. 2021 Evaluation of the Quality, Reliability, and Educational Content of YouTube Videos as an Information Source for Soft Contact LensesCitations 36 · OpenAlex
  7. 2025 Analyzing the performance of ChatGPT in answering inquiries about cervical cancerCitations 21 · OpenAlex
  8. 2022 Assessment of the quality of information on treatment of keratoconus on YouTubeCitations 20 · OpenAlex
  9. 2021 Assessment of the quality of information on treatment of keratoconus on YouTubeCitations 20 · OpenAlex
  10. 2023 YouTube as a source of information on keratoconus: a social media analysisCitations 15 · OpenAlex

Authors

6
  1. MEHMET SERHAT MANGAN İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ 1
  2. AKIN ÇAKIR 2
  3. SERAP YURTTASER OCAK 3
  4. HATİCE TEKCAN 4
  5. SEVCAN BALCI İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ 5
  6. ALEV ÖZÇELİK KÖSE 6