İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2022 · review

Methodological considerations in injury burden of disease studies across Europe: a systematic literature review

Dergi Springer Science and Business Media LLC ISSN kaydı başka bir dergiye işaret ediyor; ad YÖKSİS kaydından.
ISSN1471-2458
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · gold
Yıl2022
Atıf26OpenAlex
Yüzdelik%80,3
FWCI1,531,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q1
WoS (JCR)Q2

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)BMC Public Health
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

BACKGROUND: Calculating the disease burden due to injury is complex, as it requires many methodological choices. Until now, an overview of the methodological design choices that have been made in burden of disease (BoD) studies in injury populations is not available. The aim of this systematic literature review was to identify existing injury BoD studies undertaken across Europe and to comprehensively review the methodological design choices and assumption parameters that have been made to calculate years of life lost (YLL) and years lived with disability (YLD) in these studies. METHODS: We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, and the grey literature supplemented by handsearching, for BoD studies. We included injury BoD studies that quantified the BoD expressed in YLL, YLD, and disability-adjusted life years (DALY) in countries within the European Region between early-1990 and mid-2021. RESULTS: We retrieved 2,914 results of which 48 performed an injury-specific BoD assessment. Single-country independent and Global Burden of Disease (GBD)-linked injury BoD studies were performed in 11 European countries. Approximately 79% of injury BoD studies reported the BoD by external cause-of-injury. Most independent studies used the incidence-based approach to calculate YLDs. About half of the injury disease burden studies applied disability weights (DWs) developed by the GBD study. Almost all independent injury studies have determined YLL using national life tables. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable methodological variation across independent injury BoD assessments was observed; differences were mainly apparent in the design choices and assumption parameters towards injury YLD calculations, implementation of DWs, and the choice of life table for YLL calculations. Development and use of guidelines for performing and reporting of injury BoD studies is crucial to enhance transparency and comparability of injury BoD estimates across Europe and beyond.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

26atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 8 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2023 Burden of infectious disease studies in Europe and the United Kingdom: a review of methodological design choicesAtıf 12 · OpenAlex
  2. 2023 Burden of infectious disease studies in Europe and the United Kingdom: a review of methodological design choicesAtıf 12 · OpenAlex
  3. 2023 Burden of infectious disease studies in Europe and the United Kingdom: a review of methodological design choicesAtıf 12 · OpenAlex
  4. 2023 Burden of infectious disease studies in Europe and the United Kingdom: a review of methodological design choicesAtıf 12 · OpenAlex
  5. 2023 Burden of disease attributable to risk factors in European countries: a scoping literature reviewAtıf 11 · OpenAlex
  6. 2023 Burden of disease attributable to risk factors in European countries: a scoping literature reviewAtıf 11 · OpenAlex
  7. 2023 Burden of disease attributable to risk factors in European countries: a scoping literature reviewAtıf 11 · OpenAlex
  8. 2023 Burden of disease attributable to risk factors in European countries: a scoping literature reviewAtıf 11 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

69
  1. Periklis Charalampous 1
  2. Elena Pallari 2
  3. Vanessa Gorasso 3
  4. Elena von der Lippe 4
  5. Brecht Devleesschauwer 5
  6. Sara M Pires 6
  7. Dietrich Plass 7
  8. Jane Idavain 8
  9. Che Henry Ngwa 9
  10. Isabel Noguer 10
  11. Alicia Padron Monedero 11
  12. Rodrigo Sarmiento 12
  13. Marek Majdan 13
  14. Balázs Ádám 14
  15. Ala a AlKerwi 15
  16. Seila Cilovic Lagarija 16
  17. Benjamin Clarsen 17
  18. Barbara Corso 18
  19. Sarah Cuschieri 19
  20. Keren Dopelt 20
  21. Mary Economou 21
  22. Florian Fischer 22
  23. Alberto Freitas 23
  24. Juan Manuel García González 24
  25. Federica Gazzelloni 25
  26. Artemis Gkitakou 26
  27. HAKAN GÜLMEZ 27
  28. Paul Hynds 28
  29. Gaetano Isola 29
  30. Lea S Jakobsen 30
  31. Zubair Kabir 31
  32. Katarzyna Kissimova Skarbek 32
  33. Ann Kristin Knudsen 33
  34. NAİME MERİÇ KONAR EROL 34
  35. Carina Ladeira 35
  36. Brian Lassen 36
  37. Aaron Liew 37
  38. Marjeta Majer 38
  39. Enkeleint A Mechili 39
  40. Alibek Mereke 40
  41. Lorenzo Monasta 41
  42. Stefania Mondello 42
  43. Joana Nazaré Morgado 43
  44. Evangelia Nena 44
  45. Edmond S W Ng 45
  46. Vikram Niranjan 46
  47. Iskra Alexandra Nola 47
  48. Rónán O Caoimh 48
  49. Panagiotis Petrou 49
  50. Vera Pinheiro 50
  51. Miguel Reina Ortiz 51
  52. Silvia Riva 52
  53. Hanen Samouda 53
  54. João Vasco Santos 54
  55. Cornelia Melinda Adi Santoso 55
  56. Milena Santric Milicevic 56
  57. Dimitrios Skempes 57
  58. Ana Catarina Sousa 58
  59. Niko Speybroeck 59
  60. Fimka Tozija 60
  61. Brigid Unim 61
  62. HİLAL BEKTAŞ UYSAL AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ 62
  63. Fabrizio Giovanni Vaccaro 63
  64. Orsolya Varga 64
  65. Milena Vasic 65
  66. Francesco Saverio Violante 66
  67. Grant M A Wyper 67
  68. Suzanne Polinder 68
  69. Juanita A Haagsma 69