Makale detayı · 2008
Relevance assessment
- Yıl
- 2008
- Tür
- conference-paper
Özet
OpenAlex · İngilizce
We investigate to what extent people making relevance judgements for a reusable IR test collection are exchangeable. We consider three classes of judge: "gold standard" judges, who are topic originators and are experts in a particular information seeking task; "silver standard" judges, who are task experts but did not create topics; and "bronze standard" judges, who are those who did not define topics and are not experts in the task.
Konular
Atıflar
OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.
182 atıf
OpenAlex cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)
Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 6 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).
- Extending average precision to graded relevance judgments 2010
- Relevance and Effort 2014
- Why Is That Relevant? Collecting Annotator Rationales for Relevance Judgments 2016
- An analysis of systematic judging errors in information retrieval 2012
- Crowd vs. Expert 2018
- On judgments obtained from a commercial search engine 2012