İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2015

Contemporary Management of Medium-Sized (10–20 mm) Renal Stones: A Retrospective Multicenter Observational Study

Dergi

Journal of Endourology

ISSN 0892-7790

YÖKSİS OpenAlex SJR Q1 JCR Q2 Atıf 45 Üst %10 Yüzdelik 95.6% FWCI 4.83
Yıl
2015
Tür
article

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİS YÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adı Journal of Endourology
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN) Journal of Endourology
  • OpenAlex OpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)

Özet

OpenAlex · İngilizce

PURPOSE: To evaluate contemporary management approaches to medium-sized (10-20 mm) renal stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 935 patients treated for medium-sized renal stones (10-20 mm) between July 2012 and March 2014 were included in the study program. Contemporary minimally invasive approaches applied in the management of such stones were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 561 male (60%) and 374 female (40%) patients. Of the 935 patients with medium-sized renal calculi, 535 (57.2%) were treated with shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), 201 (21.4%) with retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), 110 (11.7%) with minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (miniperc), and the remaining 89 (11.7%) patients with micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc). In the SWL group, stones were located mostly in the pelvis (51%), while in the miniperc and microperc groups, they were located mainly in the lower pole (46%, 53%, respectively). Stone-free rates after a single session were 77.2%, 86.1%, 88.8%, and 83.6% in the SWL, RIRS, microperc, and miniperc groups, respectively. Although no serious complications (above Clavien level III) were noted in any of the groups evaluated, Clavien I to II complications were common in the miniperc group. CONCLUSION: Although SWL is the preferred treatment option for patients with medium-sized (10-20 mm) renal stones, endourologic methods also have been found to have a significant role. Relatively lower complication rates along with higher stone-free status observed with the RIRS technique compared with percutaneous approaches have made this method a valuable option in the management of such stones in recent years.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

45 atıf

OpenAlex cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yazarlar

  1. MURAT CAN KİREMİT
  2. Selcuk Guven
  3. KEMAL SARICA
  4. Ahmet Ozturk
  5. Ibrahim Buldu
  6. ALPER KAFKASLI
  7. Mehmet Balasar
  8. Okan Istanbulluoglu
  9. RAHİM HORUZ
  10. Ali Cihangir Çetinel
  11. Abdulkadir Kandemir
  12. SELAMİ ALBAYRAK İSTANBUL MEDİPOL ÜNİVERSİTESİ