İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2017 · article

Assessment of Genetic Relationship among Male and Female Fig Genotypes Using Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) Markers

YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · gold
Yıl2017
Atıf9OpenAlex
Atıf8Semantic Scholar · 2 etkili
Yüzdelik%83,9
FWCI0,951,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q3
WoS (JCR)Q4

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıNotulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

Fig (Ficus carica L.) is a traditional crop in Turkey and widely cultivated around the Mediterranean areas. The gynodioecious fig species is present in two sexual forms, i.e. the domesticated fig (female tree) and the caprifig (male tree). Caprifigs are crucial for high quality fig production and breeding while, the studies on assessment of genetic relationship among caprifigs is limited. The aim of this study was to determine genetic diversity among 45 caprifigs and 2 female figs collected from four provinces in Marmara and Aegean Sea Regions of Turkey using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. In this work, 24 SSR markers were tested, one was monomorphic and the remaining markers amplified 82 alleles. The number of polymorphic alleles per SSR marker ranged from 2 to 7. The observed heterozygosity (Ho) differed from 0.18 to 0.76 and expected heterozygosity (He) ranged between 0.24 and 0.81. The polymorphism information content (PIC) varied from 0.42 to 0.98. A UPGMA analysis based on Dice similarity matrix clustered fig genotypes into two main groups and similarly, STRUCTURE analysis placed fig genotypes into two different gene pools (K=2). Fig genotypes collected from the same region were not clustered together in a group indicating that the fig genotypes did not cluster on the basis of their collection sites. Our results demonstrated that caprifigs and female figs are not genetically distinct and they clustered together in a group. All fig genotypes had distinct SSR marker profiles suggesting that there were no synonyms or homonyms. These results revealed a high genetic variation among fig genotypes and 23 SSR markers were enough to discriminate all fig genotypes analysed in this study demonstrating that SSR marker system is suitable for genetic analysis in figs.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

9atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 13 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2022 First report of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum associated with dieback and canker of common fig (Ficus carica L.) in TurkeyAtıf 26 · OpenAlex
  2. 2021 Genetic characterisation and population structure analysis of Anatolian figs (Ficus carica L.) by SSR markersAtıf 13 · OpenAlex
  3. 2021 Genetic characterisation and population structure analysis of Anatolian figs (Ficus carica L.) by SSR markersAtıf 13 · OpenAlex
  4. 2021 Genetic characterisation and population structure analysis of Anatolian figs (Ficus carica L.) by SSR markersAtıf 13 · OpenAlex
  5. 2021 Genetic characterisation and population structure analysis of Anatolian figs (Ficus carica L.) by SSR markersAtıf 13 · OpenAlex
  6. 2021 SSR Based Molecular Characterization of Local Fig (Ficus carica L.) Germplasm in Northeastern Turkey.Atıf 8 · OpenAlex
  7. 2020 MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF FIG (Ficus carica L.) GERMPLASM FROM NORTHEASTERN BLACK SEA REGIONAtıf 4 · OpenAlex
  8. 2020 Molecular Characterization of Fig (Ficus carica L.) Germplasm from Northeastern Black Sea RegionAtıf 4 · OpenAlex
  9. 2023 Genetic Diversity, Population Structure, and Association Analysis of Female and Male Fig Genotypes (Ficus carica L.)Atıf 3 · OpenAlex
  10. 2023 Genetic Diversity, Population Structure, and Association Analysis of Female and Male Fig Genotypes (Ficus carica L.)Atıf 3 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

8
  1. SEVİN TEOMAN DURAN BURSA ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 1
  2. MERYEM İPEK 2
  3. ÜMRAN ERTÜRK 3
  4. nesrin aktepe tangu 4
  5. erdem durgut 5
  6. ERDOĞAN BARUT 6
  7. SEZAİ ERCİŞLİ ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ 7
  8. AHMET İPEK 8