İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2021 · article

Efficacy and Safety of Ibrutinib Therapy in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Retrospective Analysis of Real-Life Data

ISSN1300-7777
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · diamond TR Index
Yıl2021
Atıf6OpenAlex
Yüzdelik%59,1
FWCI0,351,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q3
WoS (JCR)Q4

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıTurkish Journal of Hematology
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Turkish Journal of Hematology
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

Objective: This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy, safety, and survival outcome of single-agent ibrutinib therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 136 patients (mean age ± standard deviation: 64.6±10.3 years, 66.9% males) who had received at least one dose of ibrutinib were included in this retrospective multicenter, noninterventional hospital-registry study conducted at 33 centers across Turkey. Data on patient demographics, baseline characteristics, laboratory findings, and leukemia-cell cytogenetics were retrieved. Treatment response, survival outcome including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and safety data were analyzed. Results: Overall, 36.7% of patients were categorized as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) class 2-3, while 44.9% were in Rai stage 4. Fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed the presence of del(17p) in 39.8% of the patients. Patients received a median of 2.0 (range: 0-7) lines of pre-ibrutinib therapy. Median duration of therapy was 8.8 months (range: 0.4-58.0 months). The 1-year PFS and OS rates were 82.2% and 84.6%, respectively, while median PFS time was 30.0 (standard error, 95% confidence interval: 5.1, 20.0-40.0) months and median OS time was 37.9 (3.2, 31.5-44.2) months. Treatment response (complete or partial response), PFS time, and OS time were better with 0-2 lines versus 3-7 lines of prior therapy (p<0.001, p=0.001, and p<0.001, respectively), with ECOG class 0-1 versus class 2-3 (p=0.006, p=0.011, and p=0.001, respectively), and with Rai stage 0-2 versus 3-4 (p=0.002, p=0.001, and p=0.002, respectively). No significant difference was noted in treatment response rates or survival outcome with respect to the presence of comorbidity, bulky disease, or del(17p). While 176 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 74 (54.4%) patients, 46 of those 176 AEs were grade 3-4, including pneumonia (n=12), neutropenia (n=11), anemia (n=5), thrombocytopenia (n=5), and fever (n=5). Conclusion: This real-life analysis confirms the favorable efficacy and safety profile of long-term ibrutinib treatment while emphasizing the potential adverse impacts of poorer ECOG performance status, heavy treatment prior to ibrutinib, and advanced Rai stage on patient compliance, treatment response, and survival outcomes.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

6atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 1 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2023 The effect of maximum tumor diameter and 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging status on overall survival in Hodgkin lymphoma patientsAtıf 1 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

45
  1. ANIL TOMBAK 1
  2. Funda Pepedil Tanrıkulu 2
  3. SALİH SERTAÇ DURUSOY 3
  4. HÜSEYİN DERYA DİNÇYÜREK 4
  5. EMİN KAYA 5
  6. ELİF GÜLSÜM ÜMİT 6
  7. İRFAN YAVAŞOĞLU 7
  8. ÖZGÜR MEHTAP 8
  9. BURAK DEVECİ 9
  10. MEHMET ALİ ÖZCAN 10
  11. HATİCE TERZİ 11
  12. MÜFİDE OKAY ÖZGEYİK 12
  13. NİLGÜN SAYINALP 13
  14. MEHMET YILMAZ 14
  15. VAHAP OKAN 15
  16. ALPEREN KIZIKLI 16
  17. ÖMER ÖZCAN 17
  18. GÜVEN ÇETİN 18
  19. SİNAN DEMİRCİOĞLU 19
  20. İSMET AYDOĞDU 20
  21. GÜRAY SAYDAM 21
  22. eren arslan davulcu 22
  23. GÜL İLHAN 23
  24. MEHMET ALİ UÇAR 24
  25. GÜLSÜM ÖZET ANKARA YILDIRIM BEYAZIT ÜNİVERSİTESİ 25
  26. SEVAL AKPINAR 26
  27. BURHAN TURGUT 27
  28. İLHAMİ BERBER 28
  29. ERDAL KURTOĞLU 29
  30. MEHMET SÖNMEZ 30
  31. DERYA SELİM BATUR 31
  32. RAHŞAN YILDIRIM 32
  33. VİLDAN ÖZKOCAMAN 33
  34. AHMET KÜRŞAD GÜNEŞ 34
  35. BİRSEN SAHİP YESİRALİOĞLU ZONGULDAK BÜLENT ECEVİT ÜNİVERSİTESİ 35
  36. ŞEHMUS ERTOP 36
  37. OLGA MELTEM AKAY 37
  38. ABDULKADİR BAŞTÜRK 38
  39. MEHMET HİLMİ DOĞU 39
  40. AYDAN AKDENİZ 40
  41. ALİ ÜNAL 41
  42. AHMET SEYHANLI 42
  43. EMEL GÜRKAN ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ 43
  44. DEMET ÇEKDEMİR 44
  45. AHMET BURHAN FERHANOĞLU 45