İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2006 · article

Formulation of the DETECT Population Parameter and Evaluation of DETECT Estimator Bias

YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · bronze Üst %10
Yıl2006
Atıf44OpenAlex
Atıf43Semantic Scholar · 13 etkili
Yüzdelik%91,7
FWCI3,291,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q1
WoS (JCR)Q4

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıJournal of Educational Measurement
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Journal of Educational Measurement
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

The development of the DETECT procedure marked an important advancement in nonparametric dimensionality analysis. DETECT is the first nonparametric technique to estimate the number of dimensions in a data set, estimate an effect size for multidimensionality, and identify which dimension is predominantly measured by each item. The efficacy of DETECT critically depends on accurate, minimally biased estimation of the expected conditional covariances of all the item pairs. However, the amount of bias in the DETECT estimator has been studied only in a few simulated unidimensional data sets. This is because the value of the DETECT population parameter is known to be zero for this case and has been unknown for cases when multidimensionality is present. In this article, integral formulas for the DETECT population parameter are derived for the most commonly used parametric multidimensional item response theory model, the Reckase and McKinley model. These formulas are then used to evaluate the bias in DETECT by positing a multidimensional model, simulating data from the model using a very large sample size (to eliminate random error), calculating the large‐sample DETECT statistic, and finally calculating the DETECT population parameter to compare with the large‐sample statistic. A wide variety of two‐ and three‐dimensional models, including both simple structure and approximate simple structure, were investigated. The results indicated that DETECT does exhibit statistical bias in the large‐sample estimation of the item‐pair conditional covariances; but, for the simulated tests that had 20 or more items, the bias was small enough to result in the large‐sample DETECT almost always correctly partitioning the items and the DETECT effect size estimator exhibiting negligible bias.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

44atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 7 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2022 ÖLÇEKLERDE İFADE ETKİSİNİN FARKLI BOYUTLULUK ANALİZLERİYLE İNCELENMESİAtıf 3 · OpenAlex
  2. 2022 Ölçeklerde İfade Etkisinin Farklı Boyutluluk Analizleriyle İncelenmesiAtıf 3 · OpenAlex
  3. 2018 An Examination of Parametric and Nonparametric Dimensionality Assessment Methods with Exploratory and Confirmatory ModeAtıf 2 · OpenAlex
  4. 2015 Test Boyutluluğunun Analizinde Kullanılan Programların İncelenmesiAtıf 1 · OpenAlex
  5. 2022 The comparison of the dimensionality results provided by the automated item selection procedure and DETECT analysisAtıf 0 · OpenAlex
  6. 2022 A Comparison of type I error and power rates in procedures used determining test dimensionalityAtıf 0 · OpenAlex
  7. 2022 The comparison of the dimensionality results provided by the automated item selection procedure and DETECT analysisAtıf 0 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

2
  1. Roussos Louis A 1
  2. ÖZLEM YEŞİM ÖZBEK ÇANKIRI KARATEKİN ÜNİVERSİTESİ 2