Skip to content
akaturk Academic measurement

Article detail · 2025

Comparison of forearm and intra‐arterial blood pressure measurements according to body and arm positions in obese patients

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

YÖKSİS OpenAlex ISSN 1356-1294 DOI 10.1111/jep.14093 Citations 1 SJR Q2 JCR Q2

10.1111/jep.14093

YÖKSİS YÖKSİS article record

OpenAlex OpenAlex enrichment (abstract, citations, topics)

Abstract

OpenAlex record

English (OpenAlex)

RATIONALE: Noninvasive blood pressure (BP) monitoring is very important also difficult for accurate diagnosis and monitor of obese patients. AIMS: The study aimed to assess the agreement between forearm arm BP and intra-arterial BP values in a different body and arm positions in obese patients. METHODS: who were monitored with invasive radial BP in the general and surgical intensive care units. BP values obtained from the upper arm and forearm with different arm and body positions were compared with intra-arterial BP results. Bland-Altman analysis and correlation coefficient were used for the accuracy of upper and forearm noninvasive BP reading in different positions. RESULTS: The best agreement was found between the forearm systolic BP in the supine and half-sitting position with the arm down and intra-arterial BP values. Also, the best agreement in diastolic BP was found between the half-sitting and half-sitting position with the arm down and intra-arterial BP. CONCLUSIONS: Forearm systolic BP measurement, especially in the supine and half-sitting position with the arm below the heart level position, was best agreement with intra-arterial measurement, regarded as the gold standard. For this reason, it is more appropriate to use forearm BP measurement in obese patients monitored in intensive care to obtain accurate results.

OpenAlex enrichment

Topics

  • Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Type: article Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy

Index information

WoS (JCR) and Scopus (SJR) quartiles by ISSN and publication year. · 2025

Scopus (SJR) / WoS (JCR)

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Scopus (SJR) Q2 0,648 Year 2025
WoS (JCR) Q2 JIF 1,5 Year 2025

Universities

  • İZMİR BAKIRÇAY ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Authors

  1. ELİF GÜNAY İSMAİLOĞLU
  2. HAKAN AYGÜN
  3. SEDA ŞAHAN
  4. EDA ERGİN İZMİR BAKIRÇAY ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  5. eliz geçtan