İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2022 · article

Cluster Analysis Revealed Two Hidden Phenotypes of Cluster Headache

ISSN1664-2295
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · gold
Yıl2022
Atıf11OpenAlex
Atıf11Semantic Scholar · 1 etkili
Yüzdelik%78,1
FWCI1,281,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q2
WoS (JCR)Q2

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıFrontiers in Neurology
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Frontiers in Neurology
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

Objective To investigate the possible subgroups of patients with Cluster Headache (CH) by using K-means cluster analysis. Methods A total of 209 individuals (mean (SD) age: 39.8 (11.3) years), diagnosed with CH by headache experts, participated in this cross-sectional multi-center study. All patients completed a semi-structured survey either face to face, preferably, or through phone interviews with a physician. The survey was composed of questions that addressed sociodemographic characteristics as well as detailed clinical features and treatment experiences. Results Cluster analysis revealed two subgroups. Cluster one patients (n = 81) had younger age at diagnosis (31.04 (9.68) vs. 35.05 (11.02) years; p = 0.009), a higher number of autonomic symptoms (3.28 (1.16) vs. 1.99(0.95); p < 0.001), and showed a better response to triptans (50.00% vs. 28.00; p < 0.001) during attacks, compared with the cluster two subgroup (n = 122). Cluster two patients had higher rates of current smoking (76.0 vs. 33.0%; p=0.002), higher rates of smoking at diagnosis (78.0 vs. 32.0%; p=0.006), higher rates of parental smoking/tobacco exposure during childhood (72.0 vs. 33.0%; p = 0.010), longer duration of attacks with (44.21 (34.44) min. vs. 34.51 (24.97) min; p=0.005) and without (97.50 (63.58) min. vs. (83.95 (49.07) min; p = 0.035) treatment and higher rates of emergency department visits in the last year (81.0 vs. 26.0%; p< 0.001). Conclusions Cluster one and cluster two patients had different phenotypic features, possibly indicating different underlying genetic mechanisms. The cluster 1 phenotype may suggest a genetic or biology-based etiology, whereas the cluster two phenotype may be related to epigenetic mechanisms. Toxic exposure to cigarettes, either personally or secondarily, seems to be an important factor in the cluster two subgroup, inducing drug resistance and longer attacks. We need more studies to elaborate the causal relationship and the missing links of neurobiological pathways of cigarette smoking regarding the identified distinct phenotypic classes of patients with CH.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

11atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 1 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2026 Smoking and cluster headache: clinical, gender, and treatment insights from a cross-sectional cluster analysisAtıf 2 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

21
  1. PINAR YALINAY DİKMEN 1
  2. BUSE ÇAĞLA ARI SARIOĞLU 2
  3. ERDİ ŞAHİN 3
  4. MUSTAFA ERTAŞ 4
  5. SAİME FÜSUN DOMAÇ 5
  6. ELİF AYDINLAR 6
  7. AYŞENUR ŞAHİN CANER 7
  8. AYNUR ÖZGE 8
  9. HİLAL ÖZGÜNER 9
  10. ÖMER KARADAŞ 10
  11. JAVID SHAFIYEV 11
  12. DOĞA VURALLI 12
  13. ÇİLE AKTAN 13
  14. EMEL OĞUZ AKARSU 14
  15. HAMDİ NECDET KARLI 15
  16. MEHMET ZARİFOĞLU 16
  17. HAYRUNNİSA BOLAY BELEN 17
  18. ESME EKİZOĞLU TURGUT İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ 18
  19. ELİF KOCASOY ORHAN 19
  20. BAHAR TAŞDELEN 20
  21. BETÜL BAYKAL 21