Makale detayı · 2021 · article
Indications, effectiveness and safety of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: A single center experience and literature review
Veri kaynağı ayrımı
- YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
- YÖKSİS dergi adıASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
- Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
Özet
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) has been widely used since 1980 in enteral feeding of patients that are not able to be fed orally for a long time. The aim of this study is to evaluate the PEG indications, effectiveness and PEG related complications from a single center in Istanbul, Turkey. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: 265 patients with PEG who were followed up by the clinical nutrition team of a university hospital between 2010-2018 were evaluated retrospectively. Nutritional Risk Screening-2002 (NRS-2002) test, anthropometric measurements, bioelectrical impedance analysis and laboratory data were used to evaluate the patients' nutritional status. RESULTS: The most common indications for PEG were dementia (35.1%), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (22.6%), stroke (15.8%), and cancer (14%). The mean body weight of the patients was increased after PEG (63.5±12.2 vs 62.0±12.7 kg). Mid upper arm circumference and calf circumference of the patients increased after PEG (27.5±2.5 vs 25.4±3.1 cm and 32.2±7.9 vs 29.6±5.9 cm, respectively). Serum albumin of the patients was increased significantly after PEG (3.34±0.69 g/dL to 3.64±0.65 g/dL) without any significant change in serum CRP. Subgroup analyses showed a significant increase in the mean serum albumin of patients with dementia after PEG (3.23±0.67 g/dL to 3.54±0.58 g/dL). Local insertion site infection occurred in 15 patients (5.6%) and only 3 patients had systemic inflammatory symptoms after local infection (1.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study showed that long-term enteral feeding with PEG is an effective and safe method that provides improvement in nutritional status.
Konular
Atıflar
OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.
5atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)
Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 3 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).