İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2024

A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial neural network, machine learning, deep learning, and ensemble learning approaches in field of geotechnical engineering

Dergi

NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS

ISSN 0941-0643

ISSN kaydı başka bir dergiye işaret ediyor; ad YÖKSİS kaydından.

YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · hybrid SJR Q1 JCR Q2 Atıf 139 Üst %1 Yüzdelik 99.6% FWCI 12.02
Yıl
2024
Tür
review

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİS YÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adı NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN) Neural Computing and Applications
  • OpenAlex OpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)

Özet

OpenAlex · İngilizce

Abstract Artificial neural networks (ANN), machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and ensemble learning (EL) are four outstanding approaches that enable algorithms to extract information from data and make predictions or decisions autonomously without the need for direct instructions. ANN, ML, DL, and EL models have found extensive application in predicting geotechnical and geoenvironmental parameters. This research aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the applications of ANN, ML, DL, and EL in addressing forecasting within the field related to geotechnical engineering, including soil mechanics, foundation engineering, rock mechanics, environmental geotechnics, and transportation geotechnics. Previous studies have not collectively examined all four algorithms—ANN, ML, DL, and EL—and have not explored their advantages and disadvantages in the field of geotechnical engineering. This research aims to categorize and address this gap in the existing literature systematically. An extensive dataset of relevant research studies was gathered from the Web of Science and subjected to an analysis based on their approach, primary focus and objectives, year of publication, geographical distribution, and results. Additionally, this study included a co-occurrence keyword analysis that covered ANN, ML, DL, and EL techniques, systematic reviews, geotechnical engineering, and review articles that the data, sourced from the Scopus database through the Elsevier Journal, were then visualized using VOS Viewer for further examination. The results demonstrated that ANN is widely utilized despite the proven potential of ML, DL, and EL methods in geotechnical engineering due to the need for real-world laboratory data that civil and geotechnical engineers often encounter. However, when it comes to predicting behavior in geotechnical scenarios, EL techniques outperform all three other methods. Additionally, the techniques discussed here assist geotechnical engineering in understanding the benefits and disadvantages of ANN, ML, DL, and EL within the geo techniques area. This understanding enables geotechnical practitioners to select the most suitable techniques for creating a certainty and resilient ecosystem.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

139 atıf

OpenAlex cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yazarlar

  1. Amir Hossein Vakili
  2. Ahmed Khamees
  3. ELNAZ YAGHOUBI İSTANBUL TOPKAPI ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  4. ELAHEH YAGHOUBI