İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2020

Is There a Way to Predict Granulosa Cell Tumor of the Ovary? The Role of Peripheral Blood Test Parameters

Medical Journal of Bakirkoy

YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · diamond SJR Q4 TR Index Atıf 1 Yüzdelik 3.5% FWCI 0.0
Yıl
2020
ISSN
1305-9319
Tür
article

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİS YÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • OpenAlex OpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)

Özet

İngilizce (OpenAlex)

Objective: As the clinical characteristics and clinical presentation of granulosa cell tumour of the ovary (GCTO) are not specific, predictive markers are required.The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of peripheral blood parameters in the preoperative prediction of GCTO.Method: This retrospective case-control study included 34 patients with GCTO (Group 1) and 158 females with benign ovarian mass (Group 2).Data were recorded and the groups were compared in respect of age, gravida, parity, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and red cell distribution width (RDW).Results: With the exception of age, no difference was determined between the groups in respect of the other demographic parameters.In the study group, the RDW values were lower and NLR and PLR were higher than in the control group.The differences between the groups were statistically significant (p=0.003,p=0.013, p=0.038, respectively).The cutoff values obtained from the ROC curve for RDW, NLR and PLR were 14.3, 2.03 and 129.3, respectively.RDW was the only marker with sensitivity (67.6%) and specificity (65.8%) over 60%.In the study group a positive correlation was determined between tumour diameter and NLR (r=0.46,p=0.006).Conclusion: Although increased RDW is a strong determinant of mortality, including cancer-related deaths, the results of this study showed decreased RDW in GCTO.Low RDW could possibly be used as a screening tool in GCTO.

Konular

  • Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment

Birincil konu Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment

Yazarlar

  1. Muzaffer Seyhan Cikman
  2. İSMET GÜN
  3. Önder Sakin
  4. Kazibe Koyuncu
  5. Ali Doğukan Anğın
  6. ATEŞ KARATEKE
  7. ENİS ÖZKAYA KIRKLARELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ