İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2025 · article

Can ChatGPT Generate Acceptable Case-Based Multiple-Choice Questions for Medical School Anatomy Exams? A Pilot Study on Item Difficulty and Discrimination

ISSN0897-3806
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Üst %10
Yıl2025
Atıf15OpenAlex
Yüzdelik%93,3
FWCI3,741,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q1
WoS (JCR)Q1

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıCLINICAL ANATOMY
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Clinical Anatomy
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

Developing high-quality multiple-choice questions (MCQs) for medical school exams is effortful and time-consuming. In this study, we investigated the ability of ChatGPT to generate case-based anatomy MCQs with acceptable levels of item difficulty and discrimination for medical school exams. We used ChatGPT to generate case-based anatomy MCQs for an endocrine and urogenital system exam based on a framework for artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted item generation. The questions were evaluated by experts, approved by the department, and administered to 502 second-year medical students (372 Turkish-language, 130 English-language). The items were analyzed to determine the discrimination and difficulty indices. The item discrimination indices ranged from 0.29 to 0.54, indicating acceptable differentiation between high- and low-performing students. All items in Turkish (six out of six) and five out of six in English met the higher discrimination threshold (≥ 0.30) required for large-scale standardized tests. The item difficulty indices ranged from 0.41 to 0.89, most items falling within the moderate difficulty range (0.20-0.80). Therefore, it was concluded that ChatGPT can generate case-based anatomy MCQs with acceptable psychometric properties, offering a promising tool for medical educators. However, human expertise remains crucial for reviewing and refining AI-generated assessment items. Future research should explore AI-generated MCQs across various anatomy topics and investigate different AI models for question generation.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

15atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 7 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2026 Validity of AI-generated multiple-choice questions in medical education: a systematic reviewAtıf 5 · OpenAlex
  2. 2026 Validity of AI-generated multiple-choice questions in medical education: a systematic reviewAtıf 5 · OpenAlex
  3. 2026 Validity of AI-generated multiple-choice questions in medical education: a systematic reviewAtıf 5 · OpenAlex
  4. 2025 Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Generation of Case Scenarios and Multiple-Choice Questions in Psychiatry: A Pilot StudyAtıf 4 · OpenAlex
  5. 2026 Is artificial intelligence getting better at anatomy? A two‐year review of ChatGPT's free public versionsAtıf 3 · OpenAlex
  6. 2026 Artificial intelligence in anatomy education: a systematic review of ChatGPT’s effectiveness as a learning toolAtıf 3 · OpenAlex
  7. 2026 Artificial intelligence in anatomy education: a systematic review of ChatGPT’s effectiveness as a learning toolAtıf 3 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

5
  1. YAVUZ SELİM KIYAK GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 1
  2. AYŞE SOYLU GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 2
  3. ÖZLEM COŞKUN GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 3
  4. IŞIL İREM BUDAKOĞLU 4
  5. TUNCAY VEYSEL PEKER 5