İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2009 · article

An Experimental Investigation of the Cold Mass Fraction Nozzle Number and Inlet Pressure Effects on Performance of Counter Flow Vortex Tube

ISSN0022-1481
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Üst %10
Yıl2009
Atıf36OpenAlex
Yüzdelik%96,3
FWCI6,391,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q1
WoS (JCR)Q2

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıJournal of Heat Transfer
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Journal of Heat Transfer
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

This paper discusses the experimental investigation of vortex tube performance as it relates to cold mass fraction, inlet pressure, and nozzle number. The orifices have been made of the polyamide plastic material. Five different orifices, each with two, three, four, five and six nozzles, respectively, were manufactured and used during the test. The experiments have been conducted with each one of those orifices shown above, and the performance of the vortex tube has been tested with air inlet pressures varying from 150 kPa to 700 kPa with 50 kPa increments and the cold mass fractions of 0.5–0.7 with 0.02 increments. The energy separation has been investigated by use of the experimentally obtained data. The results of the experimental study have shown that the inlet pressure was the most effective parameter on heating and the cooling performance of the vortex tube. This occurs due to the higher angular velocities and angular momentum conservation inside the vortex tube. The higher the inlet pressure produces, the higher the angular velocity difference between the center flow and the peripheral flow in the tube. Furthermore, the higher velocity also means a higher frictional heat formation between the wall and the flow at the wall surface of the tube. This results in lower cold outlet temperatures and higher hot outlet temperatures.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

36atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 13 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2018 Effects of working fluid, nozzle number, nozzle material and connection type on thermal performance of a Ranque-Hilsch vortex tube: A reviewAtıf 66 · OpenAlex
  2. 2010 An Experimental Investigation of Performance and Exergy Analysis of a Counterflow Vortex Tube Having Various Nozzle Numbers at Different Inlet Pressures of Air Oxygen Nitrogen and ArgonAtıf 40 · OpenAlex
  3. 2010 An Experimental Investigation of Performance and Exergy Analysis of a Counterflow Vortex Tube Having Various Nozzle Numbers at Different Inlet Pressures of Air, Oxygen, Nitrogen, and ArgonAtıf 40 · OpenAlex
  4. 2010 Modeling of heating and cooling performance of counter flow type vortex tube by using artificial neural networkAtıf 29 · OpenAlex
  5. 2009 Modeling of heating and cooling performance of counter flow type vortex tube by using artificial neural networkAtıf 29 · OpenAlex
  6. 2010 Modeling of heating and cooling performance of counter flow type vortex tube by using artificial neural networkAtıf 28 · OpenAlex
  7. 2011 Application of the output dependent feature scaling in modeling and prediction of performance of counter flow vortex tube having various nozzles numbers at different inlet pressures of air oxygen nitrogen and argonAtıf 23 · OpenAlex
  8. 2018 Experimental Study About Performance Analysis of Parallel Connected Ranque-Hilsch Counter Flow Vortex Tubes With Different Nozzle Numbers and MaterialsAtıf 20 · OpenAlex
  9. 2018 Experimental Study About Performance Analysis of Parallel Connected Ranque–Hilsch Counter Flow Vortex Tubes With Different Nozzle Numbers and MaterialsAtıf 20 · OpenAlex
  10. 2018 Experimental Study About Performance Analysis of Parallel Connected Ranque–Hilsch Counter Flow Vortex Tubes With Different Nozzle Numbers and MaterialsAtıf 20 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

2
  1. VOLKAN KIRMACI 1
  2. ONURALP ULUER GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 2