İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2025 · article

Simplified Molecular International Prognostic Index as an eligibility criterion for clinical trials: Analysis of the Turkish Lymphoma Study Groups large B‐cell lymphoma cohort

ISSN0007-1048
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · hybrid
Yıl2025
Atıf1OpenAlex
Yüzdelik%69,6
FWCI0,711,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q1
WoS (JCR)Q2

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıBritish Journal of Haematology
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)British Journal of Haematology
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

Comparative first-line trials in large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) have mostly failed over the last decade. Failures were commonly attributed to overestimation of the progression risk for the control arms, bringing the precision of the international prognostic index (IPI) into scrutiny. Simplified molecular IPI (smIPI), introduced at American Society of Hematology 2023, was developed to address the shortcomings of IPI. This study investigated smIPI and its potential implications as trial eligibility criteria among a multicentre LBCL cohort of 1439 patients. Patients diagnosed between 2012 and 2024 were included. Data were collected from institutional archives. The primary end-point was risk stratification for progression-free survival (PFS). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods were used for survival analyses. The smIPI reclassified 38.2% and 5.3% of patients to higher and lower risk groups from IPI, respectively. Patients reclassified to higher risk groups by smIPI had an increased risk of progression than the rest of the group (hazard ratio = 1.34, p = 0.003). High-risk groups classified by IPI and smIPI had similar outcomes (3-year PFS 54.9% vs. 56.3%); however, the high-risk group size was expanded by 35.2% when defined by smIPI. The smIPI is easily applicable and more sensitive than IPI in identifying patients under high risk of progression who are ideal candidates to participate in clinical research.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

1atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 2 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2025 Exploring an independent association between rituximab‐cyclophosphamide‐doxorubicin‐vincristine‐prednisolone dose intensity and clinical outcomes in large B‐cell lymphoma: Analyses of subsequent endpoints following a complete response in a real‐world cohort of 1369 patientsAtıf 1 · OpenAlex
  2. 2025 Exploring an independent association between rituximab‐cyclophosphamide‐doxorubicin‐vincristine‐prednisolone dose intensity and clinical outcomes in large B‐cell lymphoma: Analyses of subsequent endpoints following a complete response in a real‐world cohort of 1369 patientsAtıf 1 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

25
  1. UMUT YILMAZ 1
  2. ESRA TERZİ DEMİRSOY 2
  3. FATMA KEKLİK KARADAĞ 3
  4. UĞUR HATİPOĞLU 4
  5. MERAL ULUKÖYLÜ MENGÜÇ 5
  6. EBRU PEKGÜÇ 6
  7. TANER TAN 7
  8. EDA KANTARCI NUHOĞLU 8
  9. METBAN MASTANZADE 9
  10. ALİ DURDU 10
  11. MERVE APAYDIN KAYER 11
  12. MUSTAFA MURAT ÖZBALAK 12
  13. TUĞRUL ELVERDİ 13
  14. ASU FERGÜN YILMAZ 14
  15. DENİZ GÖREN HALİÇ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 15
  16. TAYFUR TOPTAŞ 16
  17. TURGAY ULAŞ 17
  18. ÖZGÜR MEHTAP 18
  19. MEHMET SİNAN DAL 19
  20. OLGA MELTEM AKAY 20
  21. MUHLİS CEM AR 21
  22. GÜRAY SAYDAM 22
  23. FEVZİ ALTUNTAŞ 23
  24. ELİF BİRTAŞ ATEŞOĞLU 24
  25. AHMET BURHAN FERHANOĞLU 25