İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2019 · article

Performance evaluation of different classification techniques using different datasets

Dergi International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) ISSN kaydı başka bir dergiye işaret ediyor; ad YÖKSİS kaydından.
ISSN2088-8708
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · diamond
Yıl2019
Atıf17OpenAlex
Yüzdelik%88,4
FWCI1,741,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q2

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıInternational Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE)
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (discontinued)
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

Nowadays data mining become one of the technologies that paly major effect on business intelligence. However, to be able to use the data mining outcome the user should go through many process such as classified data. Classification of data is processing data and organize them in specific categorize to be use in most effective and efficient use. In data mining one technique is not applicable to be applied to all the datasets. This paper showing the difference result of applying different techniques on the same data. This paper evaluates the performance of different classification techniques using different datasets. In this study four data classification techniques have chosen. They are as follow, BayesNet, NaiveBayes, Multilayer perceptron and J48. The selected data classification techniques performance tested under two parameters, the time taken to build the model of the dataset and the percentage of accuracy to classify the dataset in the correct classification. The experiments are carried out using Weka 3.8 software. The results in the paper demonstrate that the efficiency of Multilayer Perceptron classifier in overall the best accuracy performance to classify the instances, and NaiveBayes classifiers were the worst outcome of accuracy to classifying the instance for each dataset.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

17atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 5 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2023 Machine Learning-Based Fire Detection: A Comprehensive Review and Evaluation of Classification ModelsAtıf 18 · OpenAlex
  2. 2023 Machine Learning-Based Fire Detection: A Comprehensive Review and Evaluation of Classification ModelsAtıf 17 · OpenAlex
  3. 2023 Machine Learning-Based Fire Detection: A Comprehensive Review and Evaluation of Classification ModelsAtıf 17 · OpenAlex
  4. 2022 Performance Evaluation of Time Series Forecasting Methods in The Stock Market: A Comparative StudyAtıf 14 · OpenAlex
  5. 2024 Comparative study of K-NN algorithm for transportation mode detection using mobile phone sensor dataAtıf 3 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

4
  1. ABDULKADİR ÖZDEMİR BOLU ABANT İZZET BAYSAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ 1
  2. UĞUR YAVUZ ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ 2
  3. Fares Abdulhafidh Dael 3
  4. FARES ABDULHAFIDH DERHEM DAEL İZMİR BAKIRÇAY ÜNİVERSİTESİ 4