İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2024

Cardiovascular outcomes of complex bifurcation lesions following double kissing crush or nano-crush techniques: The multicenter EVOLUTE-CRUSH V study

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv

YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · bronze SJR Q1 JCR Q3 Atıf 4 Yüzdelik 83.3% FWCI 1.64
Yıl
2024
ISSN
1522-1946
Tür
article

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİS YÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • OpenAlex OpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)

Özet

İngilizce (OpenAlex)

BACKGROUND: Double kissing crush (DKC) and nano-crush (NC) techniques are frequently used, but the comparison for both techniques is still lacking. The goal of this multicenter study was to retrospectively assess the midterm clinical results of DKC and NC stenting in patients with complex bifurcation lesions (CBLs). METHODS: A total of 324 consecutive patients [male: 245 (75.6%), mean age: 60.73 ± 10.21 years] who underwent bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention between January 2019 and May 2023 were included. The primary endpoint defined as the major cardiovascular events (MACE) included cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was performed to reduce treatment selection bias. This is the first report comparing the clinical outcomes of DKC and NC stenting in patients with CBL. RESULTS: The initial revascularization strategy was DKC in 216 (66.7%) cases and NC in 108 (33.3%) patients. SYNTAX scores [25.5 ± 6.73 vs. 23.32 ± 6.22, p = 0.005] were notably higher in the NC group than the DKC group. The procedure time (76.98 ± 25.1 vs. 57.5 ± 22.99 min, p = 0.001) was notably higher in the DKC group. The incidence of MACE (18.5 vs. 9.7%, p = 0.025), clinically driven TLR (14.8 vs. 6%, p = 0.009), and TVMI (10.2 vs. 4.2%, p = 0.048) were notably higher in the NC group than in the DKC group. The midterm MACE rate in the overall population notably differed between the NC group and the DKC group (adjusted HR (IPW): 2.712, [95% CI: 1.407-5.228], p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: In patients with CBLs, applying the DKC technique for bifurcation treatment had better ischemia-driven outcomes than the NC technique.

Konular

  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques

Birincil konu Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics

Yazarlar

  1. AHMET YAŞAR ÇİZGİCİ
  2. AHMET GÜNER
  3. ELNUR ALİZADE
  4. İLYAS ÇETİN
  5. EBRU SERİN
  6. ABDULLAH DOĞAN
  7. KAAN GÖKÇE
  8. BERKAY SERTER
  9. KORAY ÇİLOĞLU
  10. SERKAN KAHRAMAN
  11. HANDE UYSAL
  12. BÜŞRA ÇÖREKÇİOĞLU
  13. GÖKHAN DEMİRCİ
  14. VEYSEL OZAN TANIK
  15. İBRAHİM FARUK AKTÜRK
  16. KUDRET KESKİN
  17. HAMDİ PÜŞÜROĞLU
  18. CEMALETTİN AKMAN
  19. MUSTAFA YILDIZ İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ-CERRAHPAŞA
  20. MEHMET ERTÜRK
  21. FATİH UZUN