İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2002 · article

A comparison of traditional prosthetic training versus proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation resistive gait training with trans-femoral amputees

YÖKSİS OpenAlex
Yıl2002
Atıf73OpenAlex
Atıf67Semantic Scholar · 2 etkili
Yüzdelik%69,9
FWCI0,581,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q2
WoS (JCR)Q4

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıProsthetics & Orthotics International
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Prosthetics and Orthotics International
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

Reports in the rehabilitation literature suggest that patients with trans-femoral amputation ambulate well after suitable prosthetic treatment. The effects of exercise protocols on function, however, have not been documented in this population. This study was conducted to compare the outcome of traditional and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) techniques on weight bearing and gait. Fifty unilateral trans-femoral amputees who were attending for their first prosthesis, participated in this study. Amputees were randomly assigned into groups receiving the traditional training or PNF. Traditional treatment was consisted of weight-shifting, balancing, stool-stepping and gait exercises. In the other group the same activities were given by PNF. Amputees were trained 30 minutes daily, for a total of 10 treatments. Pre- and post-training assessment included weight bearing measurements by using two bathroom scales and time-distance characteristics of gait from footprints. A statistically significant difference was found in all parameters within the groups due to pre- and post-training evaluation data (p<0.05), but more obvious improvement was observed in the group who received PNF (p<0.05). The results of the study suggest that the prosthetic training based on proprioceptive feedback was more effective to improve weight bearing and gait when compared with a traditional programme.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

73atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 11 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2019 Comparison of gait variability and symmetry in trained individuals with transtibial and transfemoral limb lossAtıf 28 · OpenAlex
  2. 2019 Comparison of gait variability and symmetry in trained individuals with transtibial and transfemoral limb lossAtıf 28 · OpenAlex
  3. 2019 Comparison of gait variability and symmetry in trained individuals with transtibial and transfemoral limb lossAtıf 28 · OpenAlex
  4. 2019 Comparison of gait variability and symmetry in trained individuals with transtibial and transfemoral limb lossAtıf 28 · OpenAlex
  5. 2019 Comparison of gait variability and symmetry in trained individuals with transtibial and transfemoral limb loss.Atıf 26 · OpenAlex
  6. 2019 Comparison of gait variability and symmetry in trained individuals with transtibial and transfemoral limb lossAtıf 26 · OpenAlex
  7. 2018 Dynamic Functional Stiffness Index of the Ankle Joint During Daily LivingAtıf 16 · OpenAlex
  8. 2018 Dynamic Functional Stiffness Index of the Ankle Joint during Daily LivingAtıf 16 · OpenAlex
  9. 2009 Diz üstü amputelerde hidrolik diz ekleminin enerji tüketimi, yürüyüş ve hasta memnuniyeti üzerine etkisiAtıf 11 · OpenAlex
  10. 2012 Evaluation Of Gait Symmetry In Amputees Who Use Below Knee Prosthesis With Dynamic FootAtıf 0 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

6
  1. KEZBAN YİĞİTER 1
  2. FATMA GÜL YAZICIOĞLU 2
  3. FATİH ERBAHÇECİ HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ 3
  4. KILIÇHAN BAYAR 4
  5. ÖZLEM ÜLGER 5
  6. Sedat Akdoğan 6