İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2017 · article

Experimental study on the 3D-printed plastic parts and predicting the mechanical properties using artificial neural networks

YÖKSİS OpenAlex Üst %10
Yıl2017
Atıf133OpenAlex
Atıf123Semantic Scholar · 3 etkili
Yüzdelik%91,4
FWCI3,121,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q1
WoS (JCR)Q2

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıPolymers for Advanced Technologies
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Polymers for Advanced Technologies
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

This study investigates the mechanical properties of 3D‐printed plastic parts fabricated using Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM). For this purpose, a 3D printer named KASAME was designed and built by the researchers. The test samples were fabricated using polylactic acid (PLA). The experiments were conducted using three melt temperatures (190°C, 205°C, and 220°C), four layer thickness values (0.06 mm, 0.10 mm, 0.19 mm, and 0.35 mm), and three raster pattern orientations (+45°/−45° [the crisscross pattern], horizontal and vertical). Tensile strength tests were performed to determine tensile strength values of the samples and fracture surfaces were also analyzed. Using artificial neural networks, a mathematical model for the tensile test results was generated corresponding to the raster pattern employed in 3D fabrication. Tensile strength tests indicated that melt temperature, layer thickness, and raster pattern orientation had a significant effect on the tensile strengths of the samples. According to the result of the experiment, the maximum average tensile strength values were observed for the samples fabricated using the crisscross raster pattern. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) table shows the raster pattern (PCR) value of 48.68% was obtained with the highest degree of influence. With respect to R 2 , the best performing artificial neural network model, with test and training values of 0.999199 and 0.999997, respectively, was observed to be the crisscross raster pattern. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

133atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 17 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2018 Optimization of Machining Conditions for Surface Quality in Milling AA7039-Based Metal Matrix CompositesAtıf 33 · OpenAlex
  2. 2018 Optimization of Machining Conditions for Surface Quality in Milling AA7039-Based Metal Matrix CompositesAtıf 33 · OpenAlex
  3. 2018 Optimization of Machining Conditions for Surface Quality in Milling AA7039-Based Metal Matrix CompositesAtıf 33 · OpenAlex
  4. 2022 Low-cycle fatigue parameters and fatigue life estimation of high-strength steels with artificial neural networksAtıf 30 · OpenAlex
  5. 2022 Low-cycle fatigue parameters and fatigue life estimation of high-strength steels with artificial neural networksAtıf 30 · OpenAlex
  6. 2022 Low-cycle fatigue parameters and fatigue life estimation of high-strength steels with artificial neural networksAtıf 30 · OpenAlex
  7. 2019 Material extrusion-based additive manufacturing of structurally controlled poly(lactic acid)/carbon nanotube nanocompositesAtıf 28 · OpenAlex
  8. 2025 Comparative performance analysis of optimization algorithms for hyperparameter tuning in LSBoost modeling of mechanical properties in FDM-printed nanocompositesAtıf 14 · OpenAlex
  9. 2025 Comparative performance analysis of optimization algorithms for hyperparameter tuning in LSBoost modeling of mechanical properties in FDM-printed nanocompositesAtıf 14 · OpenAlex
  10. 2023 Experimental study and hybrid optimization of material extrusion process parameters for enhancement of fracture resistance of biodegradable nanocompositesAtıf 10 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

4
  1. ÖMER BAYRAKTAR GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 1
  2. GÜLTEKİN UZUN GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 2
  3. RAMAZAN ÇAKIROĞLU GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 3
  4. ABDULMECİT GÜLDAŞ 4