Autograft vs. Xenograft Duraplasty Using the Onlay Technique in Pediatric Posterior Fossa Tumor Surgery: A Comparative Analysis

OpenAlex İngilizce

Background/Objectives: We aimed to review pediatric patients who underwent surgical treatment for posterior fossa tumors and to share our experience with the various types of dural grafts used in these patients. Methods: We carried out a retrospective study on pediatric patients who received surgical treatment for posterior fossa tumors and underwent duraplasty using either an autograft or a xenograft from January 2018 to December 2022. Data were gathered from patients’ medical records, encompassing demographic details. Additional information included tumor locations and the extent of resection. Factors such as postoperative complications like meningitis, pseudo-meningocele, and hydrocephalus were also noted. Results: Our cohort included 50 patients, 13 of whom underwent surgeries with autografts and 37 had xenografts. The patients’ tumors were in various areas, including intraventricular or those extending into the ventricle (31) and intracerebellar (17) and extra-axial (2) cases. Subtotal resection occurred in 8 cases, near-total resection in 9, and gross-total resection in 33. Postoperatively, meningitis occurred in 12 patients, pseudo-meningocele in 13, and hydrocephalus in 10, with 9 requiring V/P placement. Conclusions: In conclusion, techniques for dural closure hold great significance in neurosurgery, particularly during pediatric posterior fossa surgeries. Although the modest size of the autograft cohort limited statistical power, our epidural onlay fascia lata autograft produced fewer postoperative complications than the bovine xenograft and achieved outcomes comparable to those reported for watertight closure.