İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2017 · article

Phenol Injection Versus Excision With Open Healing in Pilonidal Disease

ISSN0012-3706
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Üst %10
Yıl2017
Atıf62OpenAlex
Atıf58Semantic Scholar · 1 etkili
Yüzdelik%95,8
FWCI5,051,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q1
WoS (JCR)Q1

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıDiseases of the Colon Rectum
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Diseases of the Colon and Rectum
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive procedures may be an alternative to surgical excisions for pilonidal disease. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare phenol injection versus excision with open healing technique. DESIGN: This is a prospective randomized study (ACTRN12612000868886). SETTINGS: This study was conducted at the Ankara University and Ufuk University Departments of Surgery. PATIENTS: One hundred forty patients were randomly assigned to phenol injection (n = 70) or excision with open healing (n = 70). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point of the study was the time to complete wound healing. Secondary end points were visual analog scale pain score, painkiller intake, time to resume daily activities, recurrence rate, Short Form 36 Health Survey, and Nottingham Health Profile at 3 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Time to complete wound healing (16.2 ± 8.7 versus 40.1 ± 9.7 days) was significantly in favor of the phenol injection group (p < 0.001). The median operation time was 14.0 ± 3.8 minutes in the phenol group versus 49.0 ± 24.2 minutes in the excision with open healing group (p < 0.001). The time to resume daily activities (pain-free mobilization and defecation) was 0.8 ± 2.8 and 16.2 ± 12.6 hours after phenol injection and 9.3 ± 10.0 and 22.5 ± 15.1 hours after the excision with open healing treatment (p < 0.001, p = 0.008). Visual analog pain score at 48 hours and painkiller intake within 48 hours were significantly in favor of the phenol injection group. At the mean follow-up of 39.2 ± 9.0 months after surgery, no differences were seen in the recurrence rate between the treatment arms (13 recurrences in phenol vs 9 in excision with open healing; p = not significant). Short Form 36 and Nottingham Health Profile scores at 3 weeks after surgery were also in favor of phenol injection. LIMITATIONS: The present study was not double blinded, and a history of abscess drainage was significantly higher in the surgery group. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results, we conclude that phenol injection is as effective as the excision with open healing technique.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

62atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 18 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2021 Crystallized phenol for treatment of pilonidal sinus disease in children: a comparative clinical studyAtıf 20 · OpenAlex
  2. 2021 Crystallized phenol for treatment of pilonidal sinus disease in children: a comparative clinical studyAtıf 20 · OpenAlex
  3. 2021 Crystallized phenol for treatment of pilonidal sinus disease in children: a comparative clinical study.Atıf 20 · OpenAlex
  4. 2021 Crystallized phenol for treatment of pilonidal sinus disease in children: a comparative clinical studyAtıf 20 · OpenAlex
  5. 2022 Comparison of Curettage Plus Platelet-Rich Plasma Gel and Curettage Plus Phenol Application in Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Randomized TrialAtıf 14 · OpenAlex
  6. 2022 Comparison of Curettage Plus Platelet-Rich Plasma Gel and Curettage Plus Phenol Application in Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Randomized TrialAtıf 14 · OpenAlex
  7. 2022 Crystallized phenol treatment vs excision and primary closure in pilonidal sinus disease: A randomized clinical trial in adolescent patientsAtıf 11 · OpenAlex
  8. 2022 Crystallized phenol treatment vs excision and primary closure in pilonidal sinus disease: A randomized clinical trial in adolescent patientsAtıf 11 · OpenAlex
  9. 2022 Evaluation of the Early Outcomes of Laser-Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment Combination and Comparison With the Combination of Cautery-Phenol-Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus TreatmentAtıf 9 · OpenAlex
  10. 2020 Sinusectomy and primary closure versus excision and primary closure in pilonidal sinus disease: a retrospective cohort studyAtıf 5 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

8
  1. Ismail Calikoglu 1
  2. Kamil Gulpinar 2
  3. Derya Oztuna 3
  4. ATİLLA HALİL ELHAN 4
  5. OSMAN DOĞRU 5
  6. CİHANGİR AKYOL ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ 6
  7. Bulent Erkek 7
  8. MEHMET AYHAN KUZU ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ 8