Makale detayı · 2011 · article
Effects of a Tissue Sealing-Cutting Device Versus Monopolar Electrocautery on Early Pilonidal Wound Healing: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Veri kaynağı ayrımı
- YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
- YÖKSİS dergi adıDiseases of the Colon Rectum
- Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Diseases of the Colon and Rectum
- OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
- Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)
Özet
BACKGROUND: Monopolar electrocauterization produces thermal effects on neighboring tissues, causing tissue damage. Recently, tissue sealing-cutting devices, which are easy to use and achieve simultaneous selective sealing and cutting with less production of heat, have been used. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a tissue sealing-cutting device vs monopolar electrocautery on wound healing in the early postoperative period after pilonidal sinus surgery. DESIGN: This study was a prospective randomized clinical trial. SETTING: This study was conducted at Military Hospital, Eskisehir, Turkey. PATIENTS: In total, 128 patients with chronic pilonidal disease were randomly assigned into 2 clinically comparable groups between December 2009 and June 2010. INTERVENTION: Pilonidal sinus excision was performed with monopolar electrocautery in the control group (n = 64) and with a tissue sealing-cutting device in the study group (n = 64). Data regarding wound healing, demographic variables, history, physical examination findings, defect dimensions, and scores for a visual analog scale were recorded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcomes measured were surgical site infection, early wound failure (dehiscence), and unhealed wound rate. RESULTS: : Wound infection and dehiscence rates were significantly lower (P = .01 and .02), but the duration of surgery was significantly longer (P < .01) in the tissue sealing-cutting group. The unhealed wound rate was 12.5% in the electrocautery group and 4.7% in the tissue sealing-cutting group (P = .01). When the distance from the lowest margin to the anus was 5 cm or less, wound infection and dehiscence rates were lower in the tissue sealing-cutting group (P < .01 and .03). LIMITATIONS: We could not obtain data regarding the cost-effectiveness of the instruments. CONCLUSIONS: A tissue sealing-cutting device in pilonidal sinus surgery yields better wound healing than monopolar electrocautery.
Konular
Atıflar
OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.
12atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)