İçeriğe geç
akaturk Akademik ölçüm

Makale detayı · 2022 · article

Assessment of safety and feasibility of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of acute stroke

ISSN1935-861X
YÖKSİS OpenAlex Açık erişim · gold
Yıl2022
Atıf40OpenAlex
Atıf36Semantic Scholar · 1 etkili
Yüzdelik%89,3
FWCI2,251,00 = dünya ortalaması
Scopus (SJR)Q1
WoS (JCR)Q1

Veri kaynağı ayrımı

  • YÖKSİSYÖKSİS makale kaydı
  • YÖKSİS dergi adıBrain Stimulation
  • Katalog eşleşmesi (ISSN)Brain Stimulation
  • OpenAlexOpenAlex zenginleştirmesi (özet, atıf, konular)
  • Semantic Scholaratıf sayısı (OpenAlex ile birleştirilmez)

Özet

OpenAlex İngilizce

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) using a hand-held stimulator placed on the neck is an FDA-approved treatment for primary headache disorders. The safety of nVNS is unknown in stroke patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and feasibility of nVNS for the acute treatment of stroke. METHODS: TR-VENUS (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03733431) was a randomized, sham-controlled, open-label, multicenter trial conducted in patients with acute ischemic stroke (IS) or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Patients were randomly assigned to standard-dose nVNS, high-dose nVNS, or sham stimulation. The primary endpoint was a composite safety outcome defined as bradycardia or reduction in mean arterial blood pressure during treatment or progression of neurological or death within 24 h of treatment. The feasibility endpoints were the proportion of eligible subjects receiving nVNS within 6 h of symptom onset and the proportion completing all pre-specified treatment doses. Efficacy assessments included infarct growth from baseline to 24 h after treatment. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients (61 IS, 8 ICH) completed the study. The composite safety outcome was achieved in 32.0% in sham and 47.7% in nVNS group (p = 0.203). Treatment was initiated in all but two randomized patients. All dosed subjects received 100% of prespecified stimulations. A non-significant reduction in infarct growth was observed in the high-dose nVNS group (184.2% in sham vs. 63.3% in high-dose nVNS; p = 0.109). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that nVNS may be safe and feasible in the setting of acute stroke. These findings support further development of nVNS as a potential treatment for acute ischemic stroke.

Konular

Atıflar

OpenAlex cited_by_count. WoS veya Scopus atıf sayısı değildir; o kaynaklar için ayrı kolon yoktur.

40atıfOpenAlex · cited_by_count (önbellek / veritabanı)

Yerel katalogda bu makaleye atıf yapan 1 yayın (OpenAlex referans eşleşmesi; tam dünya listesi değildir).

  1. 2023 Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Ischemic StrokeAtıf 60 · OpenAlex

Yazarlar

12
  1. ETHEM MURAT ARSAVA 1
  2. MEHMET AKİF TOPÇUOĞLU 2
  3. İLKNUR AY 3
  4. ATİLLA ÖZCAN ÖZDEMİR 4
  5. İBRAHİM LEVENT GÜNGÖR 5
  6. CANAN TOGAY IŞIKAY ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ 6
  7. BİJEN NAZLIEL 7
  8. HASAN HÜSEYİN KOZAK 8
  9. ŞEREFNUR ÖZTÜRK 9
  10. İBRAHİM ARDA YILMAZ 10
  11. BABÜR DORA 11
  12. HAKAN AY 12